Please note that the FactCheckHub has not obtained any right from the authors or copyright owners of all third-party contents from embedded links and shall incur no liability in this regard.
Please note that the FactCheckHub has not obtained any right from the authors or copyright owners of all third-party contents from embedded links and shall incur no liability in this regard.
Please note that the FactCheckHub has not obtained any right from the authors or copyright owners of all third-party contents from embedded links and shall incur no liability in this regard.
Please note that the FactCheckHub has not obtained any right from the authors or copyright owners of all third-party contents from embedded links and shall incur no liability in this regard.
Therefore, a Colonel which is a lower rank in comparison cannot be the highest-ranking female.
Furthermore, as of December 24, the website of the U.S. Southern Command has a Colonel, Manny Ortiz, listed as Chief of Public Affairs and not Amanda Azubuike.
The claim reported by blogs.
THE VERDICT
The claim in the blogs circulating in Nigeria that a Colonel, Amanda Azubuike is the highest-ranking female in the US military is FALSE.
A Facebook user, Ike Uche, on Friday, December 10, shared a picture of a defective road and alluded it is from Imo state.
He stated that the road was constructed by the Imo State governor, Hope Uzodinma.
“Uzodinma detachable road construction. Ndi Imo ndo nu. We shall overcome fraudsters,” the image caption read. The sentence in Igbo ‘Ndi Imo ndo nu’, translates to sympathising with Imo people.
The post has garnered over 600 engagements.
THE CLAIM:
The peeling road was constructed in Imo state under the administration of Hope Uzodinma.
Image of peeling shared on Facebook.
THE FINDINGS:
Checks by The FactCheckHub show that the image emanated from South Africa.
A Google reverse image search on the image showed it appeared on the internet on November 7, 2020, when it was shared online by a Twitter user.
Similarly, the news of the road referred to as the peeling road was reported in a South African media outlet, News24.
The report states that the image is of a road linking South Africa and Botswana.
DANA AIR claimed on Friday that it had slashed airfares for passengers travelling from Asaba, Owerri and Enugu to Lagos to N18,000, but The ICIR’s fact-check shows that it is misleading.
The price slash, according to Dana Air, was valid between December 11 and 31, 2021, according to a statement forwarded to our correspondent on Friday and a telephone interview with the airline on Saturday.
Dana Air flight from Owerri to Lagos
The airline revealed its decision to slash the airfares during a courtesy visit by AHS Aviation Handling Services Nigeria Limited to Dana Air’s newly appointed Deputy Chief Executive Officer Sukhjinder Mann.
Dana Air from Asaba to Lagos
”As part of efforts to celebrate our customers this yuletide, we have introduced N18,000 flash sales for our customers travelling from Asaba, Owerri and Enugu to Lagos and this will be on till 31st December, 2021.”
The airline did not specify the class of airfare slashed to N18,000 but presented the information to the general public as if all classes could be booked at that rate.
The ICIR fact-check, however, shows that Dana flight from Owerri to Lagos for December 15, four days after the ‘flash price,’ goes as high as N32,400 for the economy class and N117,000 for the business flexible class.
For Asaba to Lagos flight on December 16, the price of economy class is N32,4000 with economy saver reaching N44,100 and business saver at N95,400.
Dana Air’s Enugu to Lagos flight
Enugu to Lagos is not different. On December 15, economy class costs N40,500 while business saver is priced at N95,400
The only period the economy class is priced at N18,000, as found by our correspondent, is on December 22/23, with other classes also as high as the previous days.
The ICIR contacted the company to explain why its press statement on Friday contradicts what is on its website.
Speaking in a telephone interview, Dana Air Spokesman Kingsley Ezenwa said the price slash was on a first-come, first-served basis.
“The flash sales are expected to begin December 11 to December 31st. It is there in the press statement. You can check that. The price slash to N18,000 is for only 40- 50 per cent of the airline capacity after which the fare moves to the next class.
“It is only for economy and not business class. We could have put the fare at N23,000, but seats are far expensive than that. We slammed it on N18,000 to make everyone fly, not many airlines do that. We opened the slot to accommodate 40-50 per cent of the total bookings and it depends on when you book. If you are not smart enough, someone else would snatch up the offer just like how it goes for Jumia Black Friday where the flash sales are limited. When someone doesn’t meet the price at 18,000, they may think it is a scam,” he explained.
However, Dana Air did not provide these explanations to Nigerians on Friday. A woman, who gave her name as Miracle, a fashion designer and cook, expressed shock over that.
“I went to the website to book it myself on Saturday, but I saw different rates. The airline should just have explained all the details, but, maybe, left the details to attract customers. This is something a consumer protection agency should have taken up.”
Republished from the International Centre for Investigative reporting.
DUE TO the emergence of the Omicron variant of the coronavirus, the United Kingdom on Saturday, December 4, announced the inclusion of Nigeria in its red list category.
According to Sajid Javid, the UK Health Secretary, the development was due to the growing confirmed cases of COVID-19 patients with Omicron variant in the country, of which 27 cases were linked to recent travel from Nigeria.
Can Nigerians travel to the UK?
With the travel red list in place, what it means is that only British or Irish citizens or residents can enter the UK from Nigeria, and those that do must first be quarantined in a hotel.
The British and Irish residents or citizens that are allowed entry into the UK from Nigeria must first quarantine in a managed hotel for 11 nights.
The cost for this mandatory quarantine cost is £2,285 for the first person and £1,430 for every child over 11.
Apart from the 11 nights quarantine, pre-departure testing and mandatory PCR testing on or before day two and on or after day eight is compulsory.
Nigeria’s inclusion on the UK travel red list commenced on December 6.
Is Nigeria the only country on the UK red list?
Nigeria is not the only country on the UK red list due to the Omicron variant.
South Africa, Botswana, Lesotho, Eswatini, Zimbabwe and Namibia had earlier been added to the red list on Friday, November 26.
However, there are now 11 countries on the UK red list and they are:
Angola, Botswana, Eswatini, Lesotho, Malawi, Mozambique,Namibia, Nigeria, South Africa, Zambia and Zimbabwe.
Can Nigeria be removed from the red list?
For now, Nigeria is currently on the red list and will remain there until a new update is made by the UK government.
According to the British Deputy High Commissioner to Nigeria, Catriona Laing, the measures will be reviewed at the three-week review point on December 20.
For now, Nigerians who do not have UK citizenship or residence permit can no longer travel to the country until the measure is revised.
THE FactCheckHub, the fact-checking arm of the International Centre for Investigative Reporting (The ICIR), has officially become a signatory of the International Fact-Checking Network.
Established in 2015 by Poynter Institute, the IFCN is a forum for fact-checkers worldwide to support fact-checking initiatives by promoting best practices and exchanges.
The FactCheckHub was officially launched in August 2020.
The IFCN stated that the FactCheckHub was considered a signatory of the international fact-checking body based on merit.
“This badge confirms FactCheckHub was deemed compliant with the IFCN principles when subjected to the established vetting process and evaluated by external assessors.
Through this process, an organization must exhibit a commitment to nonpartisanship and fairness, transparency of sources, transparency of funding and organisation, transparency of methodology, and a commitment to open and honest corrections.”
Speaking on the development, Bamas Victoria, the Editor and Team Lead of the FactCheckHub, said, “this development shows that our work is at par with international standards. It also reinforces our drive to build resilience among Africans against misinformation by empowering them with the right skill sets to navigate the digital space. We are glad to be a part of the IFCN.
By this development, The FactCheckHub has become the fourth fact-checking platform in Nigeria to become a signatory to the IFCN, joining Africa Check, Dubawa and AFP.
THE Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development in Nigeria, Mohammad Mahmood Abubakar, stated that Nigeria has become the largest producer of rice and sorghum in Africa.
A day later, the Senate Committee on Agriculture said about two million metric tonnes of rice are imported or smuggled into Nigeria.
This, in addition to the rising cost of rice in the country, necessitated a verification of the minister’s claims.
THE CLAIMS
Nigeria is Africa’s largest producer of rice.
Nigeria is Africa’s largest producer of sorghum.
THE FINDINGS
CLAIM 1
Findings by the FactCheckHub show that Nigeria is the largest producer of rice in Africa.
The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) gave the 2020 -2021 rice production of Nigeria as 4.89 million metric tonnes while Egypt comes second at 4 million. This was also contained in the November 2021 circular on world agricultural production.
USDA World Agricultural production circular Nov 2021.
CLAIM 2
Findings by the FactCheckHub show that Nigeria is the largest producer of sorghum in Africa.
The USDA gave the 2020 -2021 sorghum production of Nigeria as 6.57 million metric tonnes while Sudan comes second at 5.15 million. This was also contained in the November 2021 circular on world agricultural production.
USDA world agricultural production circular Nov. 2021
THE VERDICT
The claims that Nigeria is Africa’s largest producer of rice and sorghum are TRUE.
IN late November 2021, multiple reports claimed that the Chinese government is ready to take over the only Ugandan international airport – Entebbe International Airport.
The report was published on various news platforms archived here, here, here,here and here.
Some of the reports state the Chinese government was set to take over the airport, others reported it has already taken over due to default in loan repayment which they cited as “$207 million”.
“Chinese lenders, the Export-Import Bank of China, also known as Exim Bank, has taken over the Ugandan Entebbe International Airport and other assets in the country over the failure of the Ugandan government to repay a loan,” Sahara Reporters reported.
The loan from China
In 2015, the Ugandan government got a loan from China through the Exim Bank in order to finance the expansion and upgrade of Entebbe International Airport.
Available documents show that the government borrowed $325 million, reports the Monitor, a Ugandan news media.
The report also noted that the Exim Bank agreed and released $200m for the first phase of the upgrade and was later to provide an additional $125 million for the second phase.
The loan was borrowed at 2 per cent interest with a maturity period of 20 years, including a seven-year grace period.
The grace period ends next year – 2022.
The projection is for the airport, built in 1972, to move from 1.9 million passengers annually to approximately 6.1 million passengers and 172,000 tonnes of cargo per year by 2033.
Uganda, China react to airport take over news
Meanwhile, the Chinese government have debunked the claim on taking over the airport.
The Chinese Embassy in Uganda said, “No project in Africa has ever been ‘seized’ by China because it could not repay its loan. On the contrary, China firmly supports and is willing to continue to make efforts to improve Africa’s capacity for independent development”.
This is not the first time news of China taking over an airport in Africa is being circulated. In 2018 the Zambian government refuted claims that China is set to take over Kenneth Kaunda International Airport for defaulting on loan repayment.
In another statement, Vianney Luggya, the Uganda Civil Aviation Authority (UCAA) spokesperson, also refuted the claim, describing the news circulating as false.
“I wish to make it categorically clear that the allegation that Entebbe Airport has been given away for cash is false. The government of Uganda can’t give away such a national asset. We have said it before and repeat that it has not happened. There isn’t an ounce of truth in it,” he said.
Furthermore, the country’s Attorney General, Kiryowa Kiwanuka has said Uganda can meet the China loan terms and keep the airport.
Kiwanuka said the “Contracts in our view are bad when you put out obligations which are impossible of performance.”
“The obligation in this contract is all capable of performance,” Bloomberg reports.
Matters arising
A probe by the parliament inidcated that some of the clauses imposed on the loan were not favourable and could lead to a potential forfeiture of the airport in case of default.
“I apologise that we shouldn’t have accepted some of the clauses,” The Minister of Finance of Uganda Matia Kasaija told committee members in response to questions asked by the legislators.
The Uganda Civil Aviation Authority (UCAA) officials flagged up to 13 clauses in the loan agreement with China as “unfair and (being able to) erode the sovereignty of Uganda.”
According to reports, the Ugandan government had sent a delegation to China to renegotiate the loan terms; this turned out to be unsuccessful as China authorities refused to alter the terms.
The revelation that the Uganda government signed an agreement with onerous conditions has raised questions about the scrutiny and due diligence that bureaucrats conduct before committing the country internationally. The legislators who led the probe were also accused of approving the loan request that contained toxic clauses, reports the Monitor.
It further stated that Exim Bank once froze cash flow to the contractor, citing violation of the loan agreement after UCAA failed to implement some of the clauses, which were not favourable to Uganda.
THE SPEAKER of Nigeria’s House of Representatives, Femi Gbajabiamila, has stated that bad actors are banking on emerging technology and new media to manipulate people and spread misinformation.
Gbajabiamila made this statement in Abuja during a two-day national conference on information tagged “Information as a Strategic Tool for National Development”, organised by the House Committee on Information, National Orientation, Ethics and Values.
He acknowledged that technology and new media have democratised public debate to benefit citizens and nations, adding that only the purveyors of narrow interests, who seek to subvert the collective will of the society through misinformation, should be held responsible.
The speaker said deliberate measures under the law should be taken to mitigate the effects of misinformation that is bedevilling the nation from achieving a perfect union of the diverse cultures and religious bodies making up the country.
“Triumph over these challenges requires overcoming our differences in politics and religion, tribe and ethnicity, and building a national alliance against the forces that threaten us.
“Information management is central to success in this regard. We have to do better at making sure that citizens understand the nature of the problems we face and are kept informed of our wins and losses and the sacrifices made by those who do battle on our behalf.
Gbajabiamila also warned against taking action that would suppress free expression and robust public debate on social issues.
“Let us be aware that in trying to prevent the worst consequences of misinformation and hate speech, there is a danger of going too far in ways that smother the marketplace of ideas and deprive citizens of their free speech rights.
“That would be most unfortunate, and as leaders and government policymakers, we must avoid that outcome by all means.
He, however, stated that while fighting misinformation, there is a need to focus on building legal systems and protocols that support free expression and robust public debate.
“While doing that, we will hold to account those who in service of their narrow interests will seek to subvert our societies and harm our country using choreographed and mischievously curated misinformation.”
The advancement in technology and access to the internet over time has aided in amplifying misinformation. The tools and means for disseminating information are no longer in the exclusive preserve of the traditional media; as such, an individual is bound to come across all sorts of information.
Here are some steps towards avoiding, consuming and or spreading misinformation:
The Source
Once you get a forwarded message, it is essential to question the source. How credible is the individual that shared the information? Has the person shared a misleading statement in the time past? Answering these first-layer questions could help make informed decisions on a viral post received through social media.
If it’s on a website, check the ‘about us’ section, this should give you information on the leanings of the platform.
Date
Sometimes, old news is shared as new to mislead the public deliberately. Checking the date on an article or post on social media could make a significant difference before hitting the forward /share button.
Context
An image, quote or event that happened elsewhere can be said to be of something else. Such misleading posts like the case of a concrete column in Asia shared as a crack on third mainland bridge in Nigeria are not uncommon.
Being aware that a piece of factual information can be placed in a wrong context will aid in consuming information with a bit of scepticism.
Internet search
If you are sceptical about the authenticity of an article or claim, one of the steps to take is to subject the report to an internet search. Copy the headline or parts of the information and paste it on a search engine such as Google.
If the information appears on credible media platforms and or government websites and social media, the chances are higher that it is authentic.
On the contrary, if such claims are found only on blogs and soft sell magazines, the chances that it is false is higher.
Note that searches can also be conducted on video hosting platforms like YouTube.
Who is the Author?
In this era of the internet or digital age, a lot of people have a digital footprint. In other words, people can easily be contacted either through their social media handles or personal websites, which often contain their contact details.
So, to verify the authenticity of an article shared on social media, you could reach out to the author, if necessary, to seek clarifications. And this could be done through the author’s social media handle (s).
Ask experts
This could be by talking to professionals in the area, or it could simply be going to the website and or social media of the individuals or government agency to verify.
Some organisations have a Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) section that provides answers. Some websites have a search box where you search using keywords.
For instance, in the area of herbal cure for COVID-19, experts such as virologists, public health professionals, and often, the World Health Organisation (WHO) online resources hosted on its website could be found handy to invalidate misinformation about the pandemic and other diseases.
Visit websites of professional bodies, international organisations of repute to verify the information.
Also, speaking to friends, relatives who are experts in the field can help provide better insights.
Satire
In its literary meaning, satires are used to expose wrongdoings, usually in a hilarious or exaggerated manner. It comprises two important variables – “It makes fun of a person, idea or institution, and secondly, its purpose is not just to entertain, but also to inform or make people think.” A good instance is punocracy, a blog that publishes the government’s inadequacies in a humourous manner.
However, satire websites have also been a source of misinformation. The FactCheckHub has verified multiple pieces of information that were found to have originated from satire websites that were being circulated as factual.
An example was when a satire post from Babylon bee went viral in Nigeria that iPhone 13 requires COVID-19 vaccination before it can be used. Most satire websites are labelled as such. This can often be found in the ‘about us’ section.
Read beyond the headline
Some blogs and media platforms use sensational or clickbait to attract readership. As such, it is essential to always read beyond the headline.
A 2016 study detailed how six in 10 persons would easily share a story without reading it just because of the headline.
Reading beyond the headline will not only give you the whole story but also stop you from spreading misinformation.
Reach out to Fact-Checking platforms
You can also reach out to fact-checking websites like the FactCheckHub to authenticate a piece of information. This you can do via the ‘Submit a claim’ form or its WhatsApp channel.
Search Fact-Checking websites
Platforms like the FactCheckHub has verified multiple claims. Using keywords, you can search the database to see if the claim in question has been verified already. You can limit your search to get results only from the FactCheckHub via here, or you can search multiple fact-checking platforms via here.
The International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) at the Poynter Institute is accepting applications for a global mentorship program that will run from March 21, 2022, to August 15, 2022.
The mentorship program aims to leverage the expertise of member organisations in the peer-to-peer exchange of information.
Up to $450,000 will be awarded, with both mentors and mentees receiving compensation.
Mentorship topics include detecting misinformation on social media, communicating fact-checks with innovative formats, industry collaboration, media literacy, training and operations, health and science misinformation and more.
An independent panel of judges will evaluate and select applicants and organisations who are experienced in fact-checking, journalism and media literacy, and education and training.
Selected mentors will receive $50,000, while mentees will receive $5,000 upon completion of the training.
Eligible mentors can be IFCN signatories, fact-checking organisations, and ecosystem partners that have demonstrated success or expertise in a given area. Mentors will be required to provide educational materials to support other fact-checkers & journalists.
