Home Blog Page 38

Image does not show Ronaldo with infant Vitinha and Mendes

A viral image showing football star, Cristiano Ronaldo, cradling two babies has resurfaced online with claims suggesting the infants are now his Portuguese national teammates—Nuno Mendes and Vitinha. 

The photo is being shared in the wake of a similar viral image featuring Lionel Messi posing with a Barcelona youngster, Lamine Yamal, during his infancy.

The caption on the post read:

“Cristiano with 2 months old Nuno Mendes and Vitinha at Lisbon Hospital 2006. He selected them from birth 17 years ago to end Messi career. Wow. How time flies.” 

READ THIS: Claim that DSTV added new channel due to Ronaldo’s transfer is FALSE

The post has generated over 260,000 views, with more than 1,000 reposts and over 8,000 likes as of July 1, 2025.

 

CLAIM

Image shows Cristiano Ronaldo carrying infant Nuno Mendes and Vitinha.

 

THE FINDINGS 

Findings by The FactCheckHub show that the claim is MISLEADING, as the image features Ronaldo with his newborn twins in 2017 — not Mendes and Vitinha in 2006.

Cristiano Ronaldo, a Portuguese footballer born in 1985, has maintained a professional football career spanning over two decades, making his debut for Sporting CP in 2002 before joining Manchester United in 2003. As of 2025, he continues to play professionally for Al-Nassr in Saudi Arabia, making him one of the few elite footballers still active into their 40s.

Screenshot of the post retrieved from X. Insert: MISLEADING verdict.

Throughout his career, he has played alongside multiple generations of footballers, including teenagers and few of those born after his debut. At the 2022 FIFA World Cup, Ronaldo became the first male player to score in five different World Cups, further cementing his status as one of the longest-standing international players in modern era.

In recent seasons, he has remained a top scorer in the Saudi Pro League, often competing with and sometimes outperforming players nearly half his age. 

Currently, the 40-year-old Ronaldo is playing in the Portuguese national team with 25-year-old Vítor Machado Ferreira, also known as Vitinha and 23-year-old Nuno Mendes despite the age difference. 

However, findings by The FactCheckHub show that the image has been online since 2017. An earlier version of the image was shared by Ronaldo himself as well as Daily Mail and Indian Express. 

According to the media reports, the heartwarming photographs showed the twins of Cristiano Ronaldo who were born via a surrogate mother.

DON’T MISS THIS: Was a baby born holding the mother’s failed IUD?

This made him announce that year that he was leaving the FIFA Confederations Cup in Russia, where he was the captain of the Portuguese, to finally be with the newborns for the first time.

Similarly, he uploaded the image to his X account on June 29, 2017 and wrote: “So happy to be able to hold the two new loves of my life.”

 

THE VERDICT 

The claim that the image shows Cristiano Ronaldo with infant Nuno Mendes and Vitinha is MISLEADING. The photo actually features Ronaldo with his newborn twins in 2017—not Mendes and Vitinha in 2006.

Senegal to host 2025 Africa Facts summit

0

THE Africa Check on Monday announced Senegal as the host country for the 2025 Africa Facts summit billed for October 1 – 2 in Dakar.

According to the organizers, the event will bring together fact-checking organisations and experts from all parts of Africa.

A statement signed by the executive director of Africa Check, Noko Makgato, on June 30, 2025 noted that this year’s summit, which would mark the first time it would be held in a francophone country, reflects the network’s significant growth since its inception.

READ THIS: 50 African fact-checking organisations sign declaration on information integrity

Commenting on the summit, the Chief Editor of Africa Check in Senegal, Valdez Onanina, noted that hosting the fourth edition of the Africa Facts Summit in a French-speaking African country for the first time is particularly symbolic.

“It is particularly symbolic that this fourth edition of the Africa Facts Summit is being held for the first time in a French-speaking African country. This historic first comes at a pivotal moment when challenges related to disinformation and information integrity represent pressing issues for our media ecosystems.

“These problems now constitute major emergencies for the balance and stability of our African societies, making this Dakar gathering all the more strategic for strengthening our collective resilience in the face of these challenges,” Onanina said.

The statement further noted that the summit would bring together a community of diverse stakeholders in the information integrity ecosystem on the continent to explore innovative projects and advancements in fact-checking practices employed in their daily operations.

As always, the summit would include panel discussions, workshops, and show-and-tell sessions aimed at exploring both the challenges and opportunities in the continent’s joint efforts to tackle misinformation.

According to the organisers, key themes of the summit would cover investigating disinformation campaigns, the influence of artificial intelligence (AI), coalition-based response models, effective counter-strategies, misinformation in conflict zones, and region-specific solutions tailored to various parts of the continent.

Also speaking, Africa Check’s head of Outreach and Impact, Dr. Hlalani Gumpo, said the event reflects the resilience and shared commitment of partners in tackling disinformation, while also fostering knowledge exchange to deepen impact across the continent.

ALSO READ: Fact-checkers, media urged to sanitise Africa’s information landscape

She added: “Despite the challenging conditions under which information integrity practitioners increasingly operate, the unwavering commitment of various partners and the continued growth of the Africa Facts network remain clear reflections of collective resilience.

“The summit not only reaffirms our shared purpose but also strengthens opportunities for ongoing knowledge exchange that sustains progress and deepens impact.”

The summit will conclude with the highly anticipated African Fact-Checking Awards gala dinner which is the longest running and largest awards programme honouring fact-checking journalism in Africa, part of the statement read.

Doxxing explained: what it is and how to stay safe

0

EARLIER this year, a video surfaced online displaying photos of 87 alleged loan defaulters in Nigeria, accompanied by the caption, “Please settle your loan.”

Also on June 20, 2025, Yinka Theisen, wife of Linc Edochie, publicly shared May Yul Edochie’s phone number on her Instagram page, claiming it was in retaliation after May allegedly leaked her personal number earlier.

This act, which sparked outrage across Nigeria, not only raises concerns about privacy violations but also highlights how revealing an individual’s personal information could result into online harassment, cyberbullying, and online harm.

READ THIS: How to safeguard your organisation from being a disinformation campaign target

In today’s increasingly digital world where personal information is often just a few clicks away, the act of doxxing has emerged as a dangerous tool for harassment and intimidation, mostly used by malicious actors.

Doxxing is the act of publicly revealing or publishing private, personal information about an individual typically without their consent with malicious intent. This personal information could include home addresses, social security numbers, and names of employers.

The term originated from dropping documents and has evolved to include a range of tactics aimed at exposing sensitive data like full names, home addresses, phone numbers, email addresses, workplace information and private conversations or photo.

Often, the goal is to shame, threaten, or cause real-world harm such as job loss, stalking, or physical harassment.

 

Is doxxing illegal?

The legality of doxxing depends on jurisdiction and the type of information shared. In many countries, sharing publicly available information like a company email may not be illegal on its own.

However, doxxing becomes unlawful when it involves: threats, stalking, or harassment, leaking non-public information such as financial records, personal messages, violating data protection laws or terms of service and encouraging others to attack or harass the individual – a practice known as brigading.

A Lagos-based lawyer, Abulwasiu Mujeeb, explained in a report by The ICIR that publishing someone’s personal data without consent violates Nigeria’s data privacy laws. He cited Section 2.4 of the NDPR, which mandates that personal data must be processed lawfully and fairly, and Section 3.1, which prohibits using data beyond necessary purposes.

Mujeeb also referenced Section 24(1) of the Cybercrime Act, which criminalises online harassment, and Sections 34 and 37 of the Nigerian Constitution, which guarantee dignity and privacy, respectively.

In many cases, doxxing is used as a tool of online retaliation, punishing people for expressing their opinions, reporting on controversial topics, or simply having a public presence.

Doxxing can happen to anyone, but journalists, activists, public officials, women, and minorities are disproportionately targeted.

 

Doxxing as a form of information disorder

Doxxing is not just a form of harassment, it’s often tied to misinformation and disinformation campaigns. False claims or manipulated contents are sometimes used as a justification to expose an individual.

Unlike misinformation or disinformation which involve false or misleading content, doxxing falls under a category called malinformation.

In cases of malinformation, the information being shared is true, but it is deliberately exposed or used to cause harm to a person, group, or organization.

Praise Cole, a fact-checker with DUBAWA, explains that malinformation is dangerous because it takes something that is true and twists its purpose.

“It could be the utterance, statement of a person, data, material or document related to the person using that particular piece of information for malicious intent against that person to harm the reputation of the person in question often to damage someone’s reputation, incite harassment, or endanger their safety. It’s not about whether the information is correct—it’s about how it’s used,” he said.

DON’T MISS THIS: What is the position of law on doxing ‘loan defaulters?’

He stressed that doxxing becomes particularly dangerous in sensitive periods like elections, where true details about public figures, such as past statements, documents, or scandals are reshared or reposted, often selectively or out of context, to manipulate public perception and sway political outcomes.

“We often see this play out in the political space, especially during elections, where opposition parties dig up authentic information about a candidate, perhaps relating to scandals or allegations of misappropriation of funds and use it to damage the person’s reputation.

“Such tactics are aimed at influencing public perception and swaying opinions during critical periods like elections,” Cole added.

Speaking with an official from the Nigeria Data Protection Commission (NDPC), Itunu Dosekun, stated that the NDPC Act prohibits doxxing and also provides avenue for victims seeking redress and punishment for offenders.

“Yes the Act prohibits it, and we always ask citizens to report any breach of their privacy to the Commission. We have several means, including through email (info@ndpc.gov.ng), our social media handles, and letters can be sent physically to the office,” Dosekun said.

 

How to stay safe from doxxing online

While no method is foolproof, following these tips could help you stay safe from doxxing online:

1. Limit public exposure 

One of the most effective ways to protect yourself from doxxing is by limiting the amount of personal information you make publicly available online. Doxxers often rely on details people unknowingly share to build profiles about them.

Avoid posting sensitive details such as your home address, phone number, personal email address, or information about your family, workplace, or school on public profiles. Even photos can give away more than you realise as images showing your house, street signs, or workspace can expose your location.

It’s also important to regularly review your privacy settings on social media, restricting who can view your posts and profile details, and disabling features like location tagging.

2. Use pseudonyms 

Another effective way to safeguard yourself against doxxing is by using pseudonyms or separate professional email addresses when engaging online. Using your real name or primary personal email across multiple platforms can make it easier for malicious actors to link your online presence with your real-world identity.

Instead, consider adopting usernames or pseudonyms that don’t reveal personal details, especially on platforms where privacy is crucial. For professional engagements, create and use dedicated email addresses that don’t include identifiable information such as your full name or date of birth.

3. Enable two-factor authentication 

It’s also important to strengthen the security of your online accounts by enabling two-factor authentication (2FA) and using strong, unique passwords. Two-factor authentication adds an extra layer of protection by requiring a second verification step, such as a code sent to your phone or generated by an app before granting access.

This makes it significantly harder for anyone to hack into your accounts even if they manage to obtain your password. Equally vital is the use of strong passwords that combine uppercase and lowercase letters, numbers, and special characters.

ALSO READ: Fact-checkers grapple with harassment, cyberattacks and financial instability globally – Report

How to verify social media profiles, pages

Avoid using easily guessable information like birthdays or common words. Using password managers can help you generate and store complex passwords securely, ensuring you don’t have to rely on your memory alone.

4. Avoid posting location data or identifiable details.

Another essential step in protecting yourself from doxxing is to avoid sharing location data or identifiable personal details online. Information such as your home address, workplace, frequent hangout spots, or even photos that reveal your surroundings can make it easier for malicious actors to track you down or piece together your identity.

Even seemingly harmless posts, like tagging your location in real time or sharing photos with visible street signs, house numbers, or landmarks can expose more than you intend. Turning off location tagging on your social media apps and being deliberate about the personal details you share can significantly reduce your vulnerability. Being cautious with what you reveal helps keep your personal life private and secure.

5. Report threats promptly

If you notice that your personal information has been exposed online or receive threats, it’s crucial to act quickly. Report the issue to the platform where the breach occurred—most social media websites have dedicated channels for handling abuse, harassment, or privacy violations.

Additionally, if the exposure involves serious threats to your safety, contact law enforcement agents like the Nigeria Police Force or the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC). Prompt reporting not only helps take down harmful content but also creates a record of the incident, which can be vital if legal action becomes necessary. Acting swiftly can reduce the potential harm and help authorities or platforms intervene before the situation escalates.

For journalists and fact-checkers, using tools like Google’s Advanced Protection Program or privacy-first browsers (e.g., Brave, Firefox with add-ons) can offer extra layers of security.

Global Fact-Check Chatbot launched to fight disinformation worldwide

0

OVER 60 fact-checking organisations, including FactCheckHub, have launched the Global Fact‑Check Chatbot (GFC), an artificial intelligence-powered tool aimed at delivering fast, verified fact-checks in multiple languages.

The launch was announced on Friday, June 27, 2025, via a press release issued at the ongoing Global Fact 12 summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Developed by members of the International Fact‑Checking Network (IFCN), the European Fact‑Checking Standards Network (EFCSN), and several regional alliances, the GFC is designed to improve access to accurate information during disinformation surges, such as elections, health emergencies, and regional conflicts.

READ THIS: AI chatbots more likely to spread false claims in Russian and Chinese languages

According to the organisers, the chatbot builds on the legacy of the #CoronaVirusFacts Alliance, a collaborative initiative during the COVID-19 pandemic that earned the global fact-checking community a Nobel Peace Prize nomination in 2021.

“The GFC aims to consolidate thousands of verified fact-checks produced in over 58 countries into a shared, tiered-access database,” the statement read in part.

It noted that the tool draws on a growing database of fact-checks and journalistic articles contributed by member organisations worldwide. It uses both open-source and proprietary large language models (LLMs) to understand user queries in context, factoring in geography, time, and intent thereby improving the accuracy and relevance of responses.

Currently supporting 10 languages, the AI chatbot is designed for rapid scaling, with daily updates and exclusive governance by professional fact-checkers to ensure editorial oversight and credibility.

“Unlike generalist AI tools, GFC is controlled solely by fact‑checking experts, ensuring editorial oversight and accountability, with daily updates from 58 countries (all continents), GFC stands ready for deployment during elections, health emergencies, regional conflicts, wars, and other critical moments,” the statement added.

Commenting on the launch, the Editor of The FactCheckHub, Opeyemi Kehinde, said the AI chatbot offers the public a unique avenue to have unlimited access to verified information with just a few clicks.

“As a fact-checking organisation dedicated to applying the best practices of both journalism and technology to increase public knowledge and understanding on all issues, The FactCheckHub is glad to join experts from other continents within the global fact-checking community on the GFC project,” he said.

Kehinde added: “It’s part of our unwavering commitment to providing anyone anywhere in the world with FREE access to verified information from across the world with a click!”

DON’T MISS THIS: AFP, Aos Fatos, others win IFCN’s GlobalFact 12 awards

Meanwhile, the organisers also urged donors, public institutions, and investors to support the expansion of the chatbot. They said such support would help deploy the tool in more languages, extend its global reach, and enhance fact-checking efforts in at-risk communities globally.

GlobalFact12: IFCN urges action as AI, funding gaps threaten fact-checking

0

THE director of the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN), Angie Drobnic Holan, has called on fact-checkers globally to remain united, innovative, and resilient amidst growing threats to truth and accountability.

She made the call during her keynote address on June 25, 2025 at the Global Fact 12, the world’s largest fact-checking summit, currently underway in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Holan noted that the fact-checking community is facing some of its toughest challenges yet, ranging from the spread of disinformation and disruption caused by artificial intelligence, to dwindling funding and the manipulation of free speech by populist actors.

READ THIS: AFP, Aos Fatos, others win IFCN’s GlobalFact 12 awards

She warned of a growing culture of division and distraction that has turned political discourse into a battleground.

“Our political life no longer feels like a conversation among friends with different opinions; it has become a contested battle between enemies seeking total victory.”

Holan cited Brazil, the United States, the Philippines, South Korea, Serbia, and Georgia as examples of countries where divisive propaganda has taken root. According to her, the global spread of disinformation shows that no nation is immune to its effects.

She raised concern over how populist leaders and governments have twisted the idea of free speech to discredit fact-checkers, labelling them as censors. This tactic, she said, has allowed tech platforms to pull back from moderating harmful content, leaving users to navigate misinformation alone.

“Such expectations are not only unrealistic but cruel; they do nothing to create an informed public capable of making sound decisions,” Holan stated.

Holan reaffirmed the IFCN’s commitment to freedom of expression, referencing the Sarajevo statement issued at the previous Global Fact summit in Sarajevo. She explained that fact-checking is not about erasing speech, but about strengthening public debate with accurate, evidence-based information.

On the rise of artificial intelligence, Holan acknowledged its usefulness but warned that the same technology could be weaponised to produce and spread falsehoods.

She called for closer collaboration between AI companies and fact-checkers, saying such partnerships must include fair compensation for the work fact-checkers do to safeguard digital spaces.

Holan also addressed the ongoing financial challenges confronting the media and fact-checking sectors. She said the collapse of traditional advertising revenue and tech platforms withdrawing from media partnerships have left many organisations under-resourced.

ALSO READ: Fact-checkers, researchers urged to balance reportage to combat fake news effectively

While noting the recent termination of funding for fact-checking initiatives in Eastern Europe and Africa as a troubling signal, she appealed to philanthropists, institutions, and individuals to support sustainable, independent journalism and fact-checking efforts.

Acknowledging increasing public distrust in journalism and institutions, Holan said this is precisely the moment for the fact-checking community to adapt and reaffirm its role.

“The future of fact-checking rests on our ability to evolve methods while holding firm to our values. We must make the truth compelling and accessible. The work ahead will be difficult, but it is vital. And in that work, truth alone triumphs,” Holan concluded.

AFP, Aos Fatos, others win IFCN’s GlobalFact 12 awards

0

FACT-CHECKERS and journalism organisations from around the world have been honoured for their outstanding contributions to truth and accountability during the Global Fact 12 Awards, held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

The awards ceremony which took place on June 26, 2025 and hosted by Enock Nyariki on behalf of the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN), celebrated achievements in impact, collaboration, and journalistic excellence, marking the culmination of the world’s largest annual fact-checking summit.

Nyariki said the awards are designed to spotlight the very best of fact-checking work across languages, regions, and formats over the past year while noting that a change was made this year.

READ THIS: DUBAWA’s report on ‘Baba Aisha herbal medicine’ wins at Global Fact 10

“The change we made this year was a change of voting model on finalists to assembling independent expert judges to review all the submissions. Some of the judges come from fact-checking journalism, academia, research, AI. The feedback they have given us is that they had a very tough time just electing one to win,” he said.

The four awards given at the ceremony include the Impact Award, Creative Format Award, Collaboration Award, and the Gold Standard Award.

The Impact Award was presented to Aos Fatos of Brazil. The judges commended the newsroom for its live fact-checking during the São Paulo mayoral debate, which featured near real-time updates, sharp sourcing, strong visuals, and effective collaboration that influenced election conversations.

IFCN's Enock Nyariki and Angie Holan with the Aos Fatos team who won the Impact Award at the Global Fact 12.
L-R: IFCN’s Enock Nyariki & Angie Holan with the Aos Fatos team who won the Impact Award at the Global Fact 12.

Also, the Creative Format Award was presented to Tempo from Indonesia which was praised for its phishing awareness game that demonstrated how media literacy can be both engaging and educational. Judges said the game successfully taught users how to spot false information without losing their attention.

DON’T MISS THIS: The truth is still worth fighting for

Similarly, the Collaboration Award went to FactChequeado in the United States for uniting Spanish-language outlets with major US partners such as FactCheck.org, USA Today, and PolitiFact. Their joint effort to fight election misinformation at scale was recognised for setting a new benchmark in shared editorial workflows and audience reach.

IFCN's Enock Nyariki and Angie Holan with the FactChequeado team who won the Collaboration Award at the Global Fact 12.
L-R: IFCN’s Enock Nyariki and Angie Holan with the FactChequeado team who won the Collaboration Award at the Global Fact 12.

Meanwhile, the highest honour of the night, the Gold Standard Award was awarded to Agence France-Presse (AFP). The organisation was recognised for a months-long investigation into disinformation around South China Sea warship access, combining robust fact-checking with investigative reporting and actionable tips for readers. Judges noted the piece’s public service value and editorial excellence.

IFCN's Enock Nyariki and Angie Holan with the AFP team who won the Gold Standard Award at the Global Fact 12.
L-R: IFCN’s Enock Nyariki and Angie Holan with the AFP team who won the Gold Standard Award at the Global Fact 12.

The IFCN director, Angie Holan, in her remarks earlier, urged fact-checkers to evolve their methods without compromising their values, citing threats posed by disinformation, artificial intelligence, and funding challenges.

ALSO READ: BBC, Faso-check win big at 2024 Africa Facts summit

She called for renewed collaboration with technology companies, fair compensation for fact-checkers, and sustained support for independent journalism. “The future of fact-checking rests on our ability to evolve methods while holding firm to our values,” she said, adding that “the work ahead will be difficult, but it is vital. And in that work, truth alone triumphs.”

The award ceremony concluded with applause for all entrants and a reminder of the growing relevance of fact-checking in a world increasingly influenced by misinformation and political polarisation.

GlobalFact12: Brazilian leaders reject ‘censorship’ tag, urge action against online misinformation

0

TOP Brazilian judicial and legal officials have insisted that regulating misinformation on digital platforms should not be seen as an attack on freedom of expression, but as a necessary step to protect democracy and public safety.

They emphasized this on June 25, 2025 at the 12th edition of the Global Fact-checking Summit, held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The summit, organised by the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) at the Poynter Institute, brought together over 400 fact-checkers from across the world.

Addressing the summit virtually, Alexandre de Moraes, a federal Justice at Brazil’s Supreme Court, posed critical questions on the unchecked influence of big technology companies.

“As a good faith society, are we happy with social media? What is the social media that we want to leave to our children? As a society, did we delegate to the Big Techs the power over life and death?” he asked.

READ THIS: The truth is still worth fighting for

De Moraes, who has led Brazil’s legal efforts against online disinformation, including the controversial Fake News Inquiry targeting allies of former President Jair Bolsonaro criticised tech platforms for failing to regulate themselves.

He cited the January 8, 2023, attacks on government buildings in Brasília as evidence of the real-world consequences of online misinformation.

De Moraes stated that self-regulation has proven a failure, pointing to political, economic, and criminal interests that drive digital disinformation. He also dismissed claims that regulation amounts to censorship.

“Television is not a land with no laws, and that does not affect their freedom of expression. They have freedom with responsibility,” he added.

Also speaking at the event, Cármen Lúcia, president of Brazil’s Superior Electoral Court, echoed De Moraes’ views. She likened regulating disinformation online to introducing traffic laws after the invention of automobiles, arguing that rules are essential for public order.

“Your freedom does not mean you are free to go the wrong way, crash into another car, and kill another driver,” she said.

Similarly, Jorge Messias, Brazil’s Attorney General and representative of President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva’s government at the summit, agreed that the issue lies not with the technology itself, but with those controlling it.

“A hammer in the hand of a bricklayer can build good things, but in the hand of a killer, it can kill a person,” he said.

Messias also revealed that his office had established a Defense of Democracy task force to tackle misinformation as part of broader institutional efforts to safeguard democratic values in the Latin American nation.

The three Brazilian officials, De Moraes, Lúcia, and Messias were described as “the top three people engaged in the anti-disinformation battle in Brazil,” according to Cristina Tardáguila, founder of Brazilian fact-checking outlet Lupa, a co-host of the summit.

Their calls for regulation come nearly six months after Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced the end of the company’s fact-checking programme in the United States in January 2025. In a video, Zuckerberg accused fact-checkers of bias and described their work as censorship.

However, the IFCN director, Angie Drobnic Holan, reaffirmed the global fact-checking community’s commitment to freedom of expression. “Freedom of expression is sacred to fact-checkers,” she said in her opening remarks at the summit.

ALSO READ: Fact-checkers critique social media platforms’ efforts at combatting information disorder at GlobalFact11

Despite the strong calls for regulation, the Brazilian leaders did not outline specific mechanisms or clearly define the role fact-checkers should play within a regulated digital environment.

Meanwhile, the director of ColombiaCheck and a GlobalFact12 attendee, José Sarmiento, said the debate now needs to shift from whether regulation is needed to how it should be implemented.

Sarmiento urged governments to involve journalists and fact-checkers in the process, stressing that their work should be protected, not restricted.

“It’s important for governments to truly understand what we do that it’s not censorship, and maybe within the regulation, governments could guarantee some type of protection for our work.”

Misinformation worsening climate crisis – Report

RAMPANT misinformation is worsening climate crisis and pushing the world closer to catastrophe, a new report by the International Panel on Information Environment (IPIE) has revealed.

The report, which systematically reviewed 300 studies, found that coordinated disinformation, largely driven by fossil fuel companies, right-wing politicians, and certain governments, is obstructing and delaying meaningful climate action.

While outright climate denial has declined, it has evolved into more sophisticated campaigns aimed at discrediting climate solutions. A striking example is the false claim that renewable energy was responsible for a recent massive blackout in Spain.

READ THIS: X ranks worst in climate change misinformation scorecard

Online bots and trolls continue to amplify such narratives at scale, while political leaders, civil servants, and regulators are increasingly targeted in an effort to stall progress on climate policies, the researchers said.

The experts also report that political leaders, civil servants and regulatory agencies are increasingly being targeted in order to delay climate action.

Climate misinformation – the term used by the report for both deliberate and inadvertent falsehoods – is of increasing concern. Last Thursday, the UN special rapporteur on human rights and climate change, Elisa Morgera, called for misinformation and greenwashing by the fossil fuel industry to be criminalised. On Saturday, Brazil, host of the upcoming Cop30 climate summit, will rally nations behind a separate UN initiative to crack down on climate misinformation.

“It is a major problem,” said Klaus Jensen, of the University of Copenhagen, who co-led the IPIE review. “If we don’t have the right information available, how are we going to vote for the right causes and politicians, and how are politicians going to translate the clear evidence into the necessary action? Unfortunately, I think the [bad actors] are still very, very active, and probably have the upper hand now.”

Jensen added: “We have about five years to cut emissions in half and until 2050 to go carbon neutral. Without the right information, we’re not going to get there. So the climate crisis being translated into a climate catastrophe is possible, unless we handle the climate information integrity problem.”

ALSO READ: How the religious toga of misinformation fuelled COVID-19 pandemic

Morgera said in her report last week that countries must “defossilise” information systems, after decades of misinformation from the powerful fossil fuel industry.

She said states should “criminalise misinformation and misrepresentation (greenwashing) by the fossil fuel industry” and “criminalise media and advertising firms for amplifying disinformation and misinformation by fossil fuel companies”.

The IPIE report is a comprehensive assessment of who is producing climate misinformation, how they propagate it, what impact it has and how it can be combated. It concludes that: “Misleading information has undermined public trust in climate science and other key social institutions. This crisis of information integrity is intensifying and exacerbating the climate crisis.”

Did Ooni of Ife secure the release of Baba Ijesha from prison?

A verified X user, @AsakyGRN, has posted a video showing Nollywood actor, Olanrewaju James, popularly called Baba Ijesha, kneeling in front of the Ọò̩ni of Ifẹ̀, Ọọ̀ni Adéyẹyẹ̀ Ẹni-ìtàn Babátúndé Ògúnwùsì, Ọ̀jájá II, with a claim that the actor shows appreciation to the royal king for facilitating his release from prison.

The 30-second video was watermarked with texts that read thus: “Today, Baba Ijesha go thank Ooni of Ife because na him give order make dem release Ijesha.” 

The X user also captioned the video as follows: “Baba ijesha visits the Ooni of Ife after being released from prison.”

READ THIS: Are 2 million Nigerians raped every year? Here’s what we know

The post has generated more than half a million views, with over 500 reposts and more than 3,500 likes as of June 25, 2025. 

Similarly, the video has circulated widely on TikTok as seen here and here.

 

CLAIM 

Video shows Nollywood actor Olanrewaju James, also known as Baba Ijesha, kneeling in front of Ooni of Ife after his release from prison.

Screenshot of the viral video retrieved from X. Insert: FALSE.

Baba Ijesha’s Case 

In April 2021, Olanrewaju James, popularly called Baba Ijesha, was arrested by the Lagos State Police Command over allegations of sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl, the foster daughter of Nigerian comedienne, Damilola Adekoya, popularly known as Princess. 

The arrest followed a sting operation orchestrated by Princess, during which CCTV footage reportedly captured Baba Ijesha engaging in inappropriate conduct with the minor. The incident sparked widespread public outrage, particularly after parts of the footage went viral online.

He was subsequently arraigned before the Ikeja Domestic Violence and Sexual Offences Court on six counts, including indecent treatment of a child, sexual assault, attempted sexual assault by penetration, and sexual assault by penetration, all contrary to provisions of the Lagos State Criminal Law of 2015. 

The trial featured witness testimonies from Princess, a child protection expert, and police investigators, along with the CCTV recording and a statement reportedly made by the actor confessing to parts of the crime.

On July 14, 2022, the court found Baba Ijesha guilty on four out of the six-count charges and sentenced him to 16 years imprisonment.

ALSO READ: Anambra Election: Did Andy Uba sponsor the Prison Reform Bill?

The judge, Justice Oluwatoyin Taiwo, however, discharged and acquitted him of count one and six which were sexual assault by penetration (which took place in 2014) and attempted sexual assault by penetration, which took place in 2021) due to what the court described as lack of direct and sufficient evidence.

The defendant was found guilty and sentenced to five years imprisonment for count two (2), three years for count three (3), five years for count four (4) and three years for count five (5) taking effect from today, 14th of July, 2022. Though the cumulative sentence was longer, the judge ruled that the terms would run concurrently, meaning he would serve a maximum of five years.

Following the conviction, Baba Ijesha appealed the judgement, claiming the entire scenario was staged and that he had been tricked into participating in what he believed to be a skit. His lawyers argued that the video evidence was misinterpreted and that the prosecution failed to establish the age of the survivor convincingly. 

However, on June 28, 2024, the Lagos Division of the Court of Appeal upheld the lower court’s ruling, reaffirming that the evidence presented particularly relating to the April 19, 2021 assault was sufficient to sustain the conviction.

 

THE FINDINGS

Findings by The FactCheckHub show that the claim is FALSE. 

When our fact-checker subjected some keyframes in the video to a Google Reverse Image search, the results show that the video had earlier surfaced online in 2024, pushing the same narratives. Those versions can be seen here and here etc. 

A thorough look at the video shows that it was shot during one of the birthday celebrations of Ọò̩ni of Ifẹ̀ because the actor was seen towards the end of the video singing a birthday eulogy for the foremost Yoruba traditional ruler.

DON’T MISS THIS: Can neem, bitter leaves, Tagiri, others prevent, cure COVID-19?

Further checks by The FactCheckHub show that as of June 26, 2025, Baba Ijesha remains in the Nigerian Correctional Service’s custody, serving the five-year sentence imposed by the court. There have been no reported appeals to the Supreme Court or applications for clemency.

When The FactCheckHub contacted the spokesperson of the Nigerian Correctional Service, Lagos State Command, Onimshi Osho, to confirm whether Baba Ijesha has been released, he debunked the claim, saying Baba Ijesha is still serving the jail terms.

 

THE VERDICT 

The claim that the video shows Baba Ijesha after his release from prison is FALSE; Nigerian Correctional Service confirms that the Nollywood actor is still serving his sentence and yet to completed his jail term which began in 2022.

The truth is still worth fighting for

0

As fact-checkers gather in Rio this week, the fight for information integrity has never been more urgent, writes

A preference for truth is a universal human value. People have an innate desire for truth and dislike of liars. All the world’s religions urge truthfulness: We are told we shall not bear false witness, the truth shall set us free, truthfulness leads to righteousness, and truth alone triumphs.

For years now, we’ve witnessed societal shifts that threaten the foundation of informed self-government. Democracies seem less stable. There’s widespread disillusionment with civic life and frustration with government.

Social media, rather than connecting us, contribute to a culture of division and distraction. Political propaganda and divisive attacks are common in countries as varied as Brazil, the United States, the Philippines, Serbia, South Korea, and Georgia. Our politics is no longer a conversation among citizens with different opinions, but a contested battle between enemies seeking total victory.

READ THIS: Fact-checkers, researchers urged to balance reportage to combat fake news effectively

This week, fact-checking journalists from around the world converge in Rio de Janeiro for GlobalFact 2025, our annual conference. We arrive at a moment that is deeply challenging for all of us who care about truth, reasoned argument, and intellectual integrity.

One of our particular challenges is that propagandists and governments have weaponized claims of free speech to attack fact-checkers as censors. Based on those attacks, technology platforms have justified a retreat from reasonable expectations that these companies prevent conspiracy theories, false attacks on minority groups, and financial scams from going viral. Big tech’s attitude is that users should fact-check everything themselves, every time they go online. Such expectations are not only unrealistic but cruel, doing nothing to help people navigate their online lives.

This retreat fundamentally misunderstands fact-checking and free speech. The International Fact-Checking Network is a project of the nonprofit Poynter Institute that supports and sets standards for fact-checkers worldwide. We hold freedom of expression as sacred.

Last year at our conference in Sarajevo, the fact-checkers that make up the IFCN membership published a statement asserting the importance of free speech: “Fact-checking seeks to provide additional information, setting out evidence to correct and clarify messages that are false, misleading or lack important context. Fact-checking does not seek to expunge or erase these messages, but to preserve them as part of public debate while offering evidence necessary to accurately inform that debate.”

Beyond the social media retreat, artificial intelligence presents new challenges. While I recognize AI’s potential and use these tools myself, they have significant flaws. On their own, these tools “hallucinate” — a pleasant way of saying they make things up. If they were human beings, we would say they lie.

Without regular human oversight and big improvements in overall accuracy, AI will amplify rather than solve our information crisis. AI companies should be working with fact-checking organizations now to create reliable, accurate systems. Though some will claim that fact-checkers are out of favor, public polling confirms people want technology to reduce false and harmful content.

I suspect that people so strongly favor truth because they know that freedom of expression depends on access to accurate information. One of the best novels to ever address this was 1984, by George Orwell, which remains shockingly relevant today. In the novel, the Party controls all information and seeks to forbid even thoughts that violate their narrative. Genuine dissent becomes impossible because people lack the factual foundation to recognize alternatives.

When information is distorted or suppressed, people lose the ability to form authentic opinions — they can only choose between pre-selected falsehoods. And when people are inundated with competing claims without any assurance of factuality, they become confused and cynical, doubting truth can even be known.

But there is objective truth about factual matters. Sometimes the facts can’t be documented, but they do have an independent existence that can’t be fictionalized. Many facts can be known, proven, and often replicated by honest investigators. That’s the work of fact-checkers, and fighting cynicism about knowledge itself is one of our most important tasks.

The strongest institutions in our society — governments, political parties, or global corporations — must be held accountable to truth and evidence. Independent journalism and courts often stand as checks here, and that’s why would-be dictators attack media and courts first when consolidating power. Companies ignore complaints from ordinary people, but quickly correct actions when faced with news stories or lawsuits.

Yet journalism faces unprecedented pressures. When the U.S. government ended USAID funding earlier this year, it eliminated important support for fact-checking journalists in Eastern Europe, Africa, and Latin America. Technology companies’ retreat from fact-checking partnerships compounds this blow. Pre-internet advertising models have collapsed, and online models provide fewer resources. Sustainable, consistent journalism is democracy’s lifeline, yet the enterprise of knowledge-seeking faces sustained assault.

These institutional failures make this work deeply personal for me. My father was born in Yugoslavia after World War II. His family tried to reach the United States but was turned away, so they went to Venezuela instead. He grew up speaking Spanish before coming to the United States for university, where he met my mother, an American of French and Spanish descent from rural Louisiana.

She taught me that knowledge and learning are keys to a good life — for personal improvement and making the world better. My father also warned me of governments seeking power over vulnerable individuals. He spoke of lies told repeatedly so that small groups of men could conserve power and wealth, of jails and courts used not for justice but to intimidate and silence. Democracy was the answer, he said — a system of checks and balances restraining human passions and greed for the benefit of all.

His warnings feel prophetic today. I can see people are suspicious of institutions and  that independent journalists can be viewed as out-of-touch elites. That’s when we must reexamine our approaches and language, making our enduring values come alive for a new moment.

DON’T MISS THIS: Will the future of fact-checking flourish or founder?

Are we lecturing our audience, telling them what information is good for them? Or are we in dialogue, hearing their concerns and explaining our methods? Are we writing obligatory stories with repetitive language, or seeking new, compelling narratives that spark engagement? Are we developing language that creates connections rather than alienates? Are we willing to take risks, even risk failing, and improve our impact through iteration?

The future of informed democracy rests on our ability to evolve methods while holding firm to values. We must develop engaging approaches to fact-checking that draw people in. We must seize opportunities to make truth compelling and accessible. And we must move beyond defensive rhetoric to emphasize our true purpose: supporting the public and promoting human knowledge.

When our work does that, it stays true to those universal precepts. The truth will set us free, truthfulness leads to righteousness, and truth alone triumphs.

 

* is director of the International Fact-Checking Network at the Poynter Institute, a global nonprofit that supports the relevance and value of journalism. Before joining the IFCN, she served as editor-in-chief of PolitiFact and was a reporter on the PolitiFact team that won the 2009 Pulitzer Prize.

 

EDITOR’S NOTE: This opinion piece was originally published by the Poynter Institute. You can read the article here.