Home Blog Page 30

No, Amupitan was not part of Tinubu’s 2023 election legal team

0

FOLLOWING President Bola Tinubu’s nomination of Joash Amupitan as the new chairman of the Independence National Electoral Commission (INEC), several social media users alleged that the nominee was part of the legal team that represented Tinubu in court after the 2023 presidential election.

The claim, which has been shared multiple online, sparked public debate, with some suggesting that Amupitan’s alleged involvement made him unfit to head Nigeria’s electoral body.

An X user, @ojiUgo_nwa posted the claim with a caption :

“The INEC chairman designate was the lead counsel of APC and Tinubu in the 2023 presidential election.  Tinubu is an agbada wearing dictator.”

The post has generated over 200 reposts and more than 300 likes as of October 11, 2025.

The claim also appeared here and here.

CLAIM

Joash Amupitan, the INEC chairman nominee, was part of President Tinubu’s legal team for the 2023 presidential election’s court case.

screenshot of the claim that Omupitan was part of Tinubu legal team

THE FINDINGS

Findings by The FactCheckHub show that the claim is FALSE.

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu officially nominated Joash Ojo Amupitan (SAN) to succeed Mahmood Yakubu, whose term as Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) ended in October 2025 after completing two terms (from 2015 to 2025).

Amupitan, 58, from Ayetoro Gbede, Ijumu LGA in Kogi State, is a Professor of Law at the University of Jos, Plateau. He is also an alumnus of the university.

A review of the Certified True Copies (CTC) of the 2023 presidential election petition tribunal and Supreme Court judgments(here and here) shows that Amupitan’s name does not appear among the lawyers listed for Tinubu, Vice President Kashim Shettima, or the All Progressives Congress (APC).

Instead, the documents reveal that Taiwo Osipitan, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) and professor of law at the University of Lagos, was part of Tinubu’s legal team. The similarity in their surnames, Osipitan and Amupitan, likely caused the confusion that led to the false claim.

Wole Olanipekun led Tinubu’s defence team, which included several prominent lawyers such as Akin Olujinmi, Yusuf Ali, and others. None of the official court records listed Joash Amupitan as a member of the team.

VERDICT

The claim that Joash Amupitan was part of President Tinubu’s legal team at the 2023 election tribunal is FALSE. Court records confirm that his name does not appear among Tinubu’s counsels, and the claim likely stems from confusion with Taiwo Osipitan.

Anambra 2025: Meet the 16 candidates vying to be governor

0

On November 8, 2025, the people of Anambra State will head to the polls to elect a new governor. The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has cleared 16 candidates from different political parties to contest in what promises to be a highly competitive race.

From seasoned politicians and entrepreneurs to first-time contenders, each of the 16 candidates bring their unique experiences and plans for the future of Anambra State.

  1. Ukachukwu Nicholas (APC)

Nicholas Ukachukwu is a businessman and politician from Osumenyi, Anambra State. According to his campaign website (archived here), he started his education at Omaigwe Primary School.

Image of Ukachukwu Nicholas. Picture source: Bizwatch NigeriaHe founded SNECOU Group Limited, a business with investments in oil and gas, real estate, construction, agriculture, education, and media. He was a former chairman of Abuja Municipal Area Council (AMAC) in the FCT and also served in Nigeria’s  House of Representatives from 1999 to 2003, representing the AMAC/Bwari Federal Constituency.

He is currently the governorship candidate for Anambra State under the All Progressives Congress in the 2025 election.

  1. Ezenwafor Jude (PDP)

Image of Ezenwafor Jude.
Image of Ezenwafor Jude.

Ezenwafor Jude is a real estate developer and trade consultant who emerged as the Peoples Democratic Party’s (PDP) flag-bearer after running unopposed in the party’s primary, where he received unanimous endorsement from 853 delegates across the state.

His career spans key roles in Nigerian politics, including advisory positions to state governors, leadership within political parties.

  1. Charles Soludo  (APGA)

File Photo : Charles Soludo
File Photo : Charles Soludo

Charles Soludo, the incumbent governor of Anambra State, is running for a second term under the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA).

He served as the Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) from 2004 to 2009. Before that, he was the Chief Economic Adviser to President Olusegun Obasanjo and headed the National Planning Commission as its Director-General from 2003 to 2004. He was also the founding Chairman of the Africa Finance Corporation and has consulted for multiple international organisations.

  1. Geoffrey Onyejegbu (NNPP)

Geoffrey Onyejegbu is the New Nigeria Peoples Party (NNPP) governorship candidate for the 2025 Anambra State election. He is a retired Colonel of the Nigerian Army.

Geoff Onyejegbu.
Geoff Onyejegbu.

Previously,  he vied for the gubernatorial  ticket of the All Progressive Congress (APC) in 2021 but contested under the Allied Peoples Movement (APM).

  1. Moghalu Nnadubem (LP)

George Moghalu.
George Moghalu.

Moghalu Nnadubem, the Labour Party’s governorship candidate, hails from Nnewi, Nnewi North LGA, Anambra State.

His career spans decades, with contributions in both public and private sectors, including as Director General of the Bureau of Cooperatives and Rural Development in Abia State. He was also the Managing Director/CEO of the National Inland Waterways Authority (NIWA).

Beyond his professional achievements, he founded the Zimuzo Development Foundation.

  1. Chukwurah Vincent (SDP)

SDP logo
SDP logo

Vincent Chukwurah is the governorship candidate of the Social Democratic Party (SDP).

Born in 1954 and from Anambra State, Vincent has a general high school diploma.

He contested for Idemili North/ Idemili South seat in the House of Representatives in the 2023 elections under  the Social Democratic Party.

  1. Onyeze Charles (A)

Image of Onyeze Charles. Picture source: Facebook.
Image of Onyeze Charles. Picture source: Facebook.

Onyeze Charles is a politician in Anambra. He was declared unopposed as the candidate of the Accord party during its primary election held at the East End Hotel, Aroma in Awka, Anambra State.

The 54-year-old is running with Ezeadili Appolonia.

  1. Nweke Japhet (AA)

Image of Nweke Japhet. Picture source: Instagram

Nweke Japheth emerged as the Action Alliance Party’s gubernatorial candidate for Anambra State in the 2025 election. He secured the primaries through an Option A4 voting system and garnered 58 votes from party delegates at the state’s party primary.

He is the chairman/CEO  of Blue Shield Security Company Limited.

  1. Ifemeludike Chioma (AAC)

Ifemeludike Chioma
Ifemeludike Chioma

Ifemeludike Chioma is the first of five children and lost her father at a young age. She attended Saint Paul’s Primary School, Township Secondary School, and Saint John’s Secondary School – all in Jos, Plateau State. She studied political science at Anambra State University (now Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University), where she was active in student unionism and civil rights volunteering. She is the youngest candidate in this gubernatorial election.

  1. Nwosu Chuma (ADC)

Image of Ifemeludike Chioma.
Image of Ifemeludike Chioma.

Chuma Nwosu hails from Oduda, Nnewichi community  in Nnewi, Anambra State. He is an economist and computer technologist with over 30 years experience in the private sector. He currently serves as CEO of Jetlink Group Ltd., an ICT firm with regional interests in Nigeria, Ghana, and Liberia.

He emerged as the African Democratic Congress (ADC) governorship candidate, receiving a certificate of return and selecting Geoffrey Nwobu as his running mate.

  1. Otti  Echezona (APM)

Image of APM logo.

Otti Echezona is the Allied Peoples’ Movement (APM’s) governorship candidate, with Ezeigwe Chuka Samuel as his running mate. He was confirmed in the final candidate list published by INEC.

The 66-year-old has his first school-leaving certificate, Senior School Certificate Examination, and Higher National Diploma.

  1. Nweke  Chukwudubem (APP)

APP logo

INEC’s finalised list for the November 8, 2025, Anambra governorship election identifies Nweke Christopher Chukwudubem as the Action Peoples Party (APP) candidate, with Okeke Blessing Ebele as his running mate.

Nweke is currently 44 years old and studied Law.

  1. Okeke Jerry (BOOT)

Okeke Jerry was born in Ezinifite, Aguata LGA of Anambra State. He attended Town School and Community Secondary School, Ezinifite. He later studied Civil Engineering at IMT Enugu and Geological Science at Nnamdi Azikiwe University (UNIZIK). He pursued further studies in Linguistics, Law, and Public Administration.

Image of Okeke Jerry.
Image of Okeke Jerry.

He founded Edumail Publications Ltd. in 2005. This company produces textbooks, storybooks, and educational materials widely used across Nigeria.

  1. Ndidi Olieh (NRM)

Ndidi Olieh
Ndidi Olieh

INEC recognised 40-year-old Ndidi Olieh as the National Rescue Movement (NRM) flagbearer for the Anambra governorship election and Ogbe Reginald as her deputy. She is also the Anambra state spokesperson for her party. Her educational qualifications as stated by INEC include a first school-leaving certificate, National Examination Council (NECO), and a BSc from Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka.

  1. Paul Chukwuma  (YPP)

Paul Chukwuma was born on February 27, 1978, in Ihiala, Anambra State. Paul is married to Fidelia Chukwuma and has six children. He holds degrees in Philosophy (UNN) and Law, plus a Master of Laws in Intellectual Property & IT Law with Distinction. He is also an alumnus of the Lagos Business School.

He founded a group of companies spanning ICT, real estate, construction, and education, including Olivia University of Medical Sciences in Anambra and Olivia University in Burundi, creating jobs and opportunities across Africa. He has invested in youth empowerment and innovation through scholarships, social programmes, and the Centre for Applied Research & Development (CARD).

  1. Martin  Ugwoji (ZLP)

Martin Ugwoji, aged 59, is the Zenith Labour Party (ZLP)’s official governorship candidate for the Anambra 2025 election. His deputy running mate is Obi Faith.

ZLP logo

He has his first school-leaving certificate and a WAEC qualification.

Written & edited by Nigeria Fact-Checkers Coalition (NFC) ahead of the Anambra 2025 election.

No, Tunisia is not the first African nation to launch locally-made satellite

0

A Facebook user, @Afrocania, has claimed that Tunisia became the first African nation to launch a homemade satellite into orbit.

The post featured an image of Tunisian President Kais Saied and an Ariane 5 rocket, with a caption that read:

“Big Boy Moves Tunisia makes a footprint to become the First African Nation to launch a home-made satellite into the Orbit. According to the Presido and Point One Kais Saied; In this era of information technology, Africa cannot keep its secrets while relying on Western-provided satellites for technological advancement and communication…”

As of the time this fact-check was published, the post had generated over 1,500 likes and more than 90 shares.

CLAIM

Tunisia is the first African country to launch a home-made satellite into orbit.

screenshot of the viral post claiiming Tunisia is the first African country to launch a home made satellite

THE FINDINGS

Findings by The FactCheckHub show that the claim is FALSE.

Tunisia launched Challenge-1, a nano-satellite built by local engineers from the TelNet Group, in March 2021. The satellite was deployed aboard a Russian Soyuz-2 rocket from Baikonur, Kazakhstan. While this marked Tunisia’s first domestically manufactured satellite, it was not Africa’s first.

South Africa achieved that milestone over two decades earlier when it launched SUNSAT in 1999, a satellite entirely designed, assembled, and built by students and engineers at Stellenbosch University.

Since then, several other African countries have launched locally built or co-developed satellites, making Tunisia one of the more recent entrants into Africa’s growing space landscape.

For instance, NigeriaSat-X, developed by Nigerian engineers in partnership with Surrey Space Technology Ltd (SSTL), was launched on August 17, 2011, marking Nigeria’s first domestically built satellite.

Similarly, Algeria, through SSTL, launched AlSat-1B in 2016 — a medium-resolution Earth observation satellite built for the Algerian Space Agency (ASAL).

Egypt also advanced its space programme with the launch of EgyptSat-A in February 2019, its third Earth observation satellite. The project involved significant local participation by Egyptian engineers working with Russia’s RKK Energia.

VERDICT

The claim that Tunisia is not the first African nation to launch a home-made satellite is FALSE. Findings show that South Africa achieved this milestone in 1999 with the launch of SUNSAT, while Tunisia’s Challenge-1 makes it the seventh African-built satellite to reach orbit.

Things that can get you arrested during elections in Nigeria

0

By Nigerian Fact-checker’s Coalition 

THE Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has continually warned against vote-buying, ballot box snatching, underage voting and other electoral malpractices as Anambra election holds November 8.

.INEC organises elections into various political offices in the country.

The Electoral Act 2022 clearly outlines the rules and regulations guiding electoral process.

But many Nigerians are unaware of the provisions in the Act that could lead to their arrest.

This article highlights the key activities that could lead to arrest during the forthcoming election in Anambra. 

Legal framework

Electoral offences in Nigeria are comprehensively stipulated in the Electoral Act 2022.

It was assented to by the late former president, Muhammadu Buhari, in February 2022 and later gazetted and published in the following month for adoption ahead of the 2023 general elections.

Under the Act, offences such as vote buying, impersonation, and voting by unqualified voters, among others, carry a fine, imprisonment, or both, depending on the severity of the offence.

This effort aims to ensure credible, free, and fair elections among participating parties, thereby ensuring that citizens’ votes count.

The Anambra election is approaching, and the Electoral Act 2022 will remain in effect until it is amended or repealed. If you are a voter in Anambra, below are some of the offences that could lead to your arrest in the governorship election period.

Voter registration offences

Everyone in Anambra who is eligible to vote is required to register for the election. However, it is important to note that anyone who, without authority, destroys, mutilates, deface, removes, or alters a registration notice or document may face imprisonment. 

In addition, impersonating or registering in a constituency you are not entitled to, or registering at multiple centres; publishing false statements to deter eligible voters from registering; making false entries in registration documents; obstructing registration or revision officers; impersonating registration officers; forging a registration card; or conducting registration or revision outside designated centres are all prohibited by the law. 

These offences carry a fine of up to N1 million, imprisonment for up to 12 months, or both.

Offences in respect of nomination

If you forge, deface, destroy, unlawfully handle or deliver forged nomination papers, result forms, certificates of return, ballot papers, ballot boxes, or you consent to be a candidate when ineligible, you commit an offence and are liable on conviction to imprisonment for up to two years.

Manufacturing or importing election materials without authority

The Nigerian law criminalises manufacturing, importing, possessing, or supplying ballot boxes, compartments, voting devices, or mechanisms without proper authority. 

The unlawful possession, illegal printing of a ballot paper, illegal production, importation of ballot boxes or the illegal printing of ballot papers are prohibited.

These offences attract a maximum fine of N50 million, imprisonment for a term of not less than 10 years, or both.

Disorderly behaviour at political meetings

Political meetings are essential for the promotion of democracy, especially in a multi-party system like Nigeria’s. However, opposition groups sometimes attempt to disrupt one another’s gatherings. Acting in a disorderly manner or being in possession of an offensive weapon at a political meeting can result in a  fine of up to N500,000, imprisonment for up to 12 months, or both.

Improper use of voter’s card

Your voter’s card is meant for you only and can’t be shared with others. Therefore, giving your voter’s card to someone else to use during an election, other than an officer appointed to do so, is unlawful. It’s also the same for possessing more than one voter’s card or buying, selling and dealing with voters’ cards. Anyone found wanting of these offences is liable to a fine of up to N1 million,  imprisonment for 12 months, or both.

Improper use of government vehicles

It is prohibited to convey any person to a registration office or to a polling unit using a government vehicle or boat except such a person is entitled to use such a vehicle or boat, for instance, an electoral officer. 

Anyone who does this risks a fine of up to N500,000 or imprisonment for up to six months, or both.

Impersonation and voting when not qualified

If you attempt to vote in the Anambra election without being qualified to vote, or you induce a person to vote knowing such a person is not qualified, you can be liable of a fine of up to N500,000 or 12 months imprisonment or both. This also applies to voting more than once or aiding the commission of these offences.

Dereliction of duty and announcing false result

If you are a polling officer who fails to report to the polling unit on time or fails to discharge your duties on election day without a lawful excuse, you can be convicted and fined up to N500,000 or imprisoned for up to 12 months, or both. 

Additionally, announcing or publishing a false election result is punishable by up to 36 months imprisonment. 

If a returning officer, collation officer, or person delivers a false certificate of return, they will be liable to  a sentence of up to three years imprisonment without the option of a fine. 

Bribery and conspiracy: vote buying

Paying money to any other person for bribery at any election or receiving any money or gift for voting, or to refrain from voting at any election, carries a fine of up to N500,000 or imprisonment for 12 months, or both. If a person aids and abets such offences, the same punishment applies. 

Voting interference 

Voting must be done in secret in the polling booth, so that no one else knows the party you voted for. Flouting this rule means you are not maintaining the secrecy of voting at a polling unit. At the polling booth, you cannot interfere with or speak to a voter casting their vote.  If found guilty, you will face a fine of up to N100,000 or imprisonment for up to three months, or both. 

Wrongful voting and false statements

Illegal voting at an election and publishing any statement of the withdrawal of a candidate or about his personal character, knowing it to be false, will attract a fine of  up to N100,000 or imprisonment for a term of six months, or both. 

Voting by unregistered persons

If you bring a voter’s card issued to another person into a polling unit during an election, you are liable to be fined N100,000 or imprisoned for six months, or both. You get the same punishment if you attempt to knowingly vote in a constituency that doesn’t have your name in its register.

Disorderly conduct at elections

If you incite people to act in a disorderly manner at polling units, you will be liable to a  fine of N500,000 or imprisonment for a term of 12 months, or both. 

Offences on election day

According to the Act, within a distance of 300 metres of a polling unit, you must not canvass for votes, persuade any voter not to vote for a particular candidate, or be in possession of any offensive weapon. 

You must also not wear or display any notice, symbol, photograph, or party card. Using any vehicle bearing the colour or symbol of a political party, loitering around a polling unit, or blaring a siren is also prohibited. 

Flouting these prohibitions can result in a fine of N100,000 or a term of imprisonment of six months. 

In addition, the snatching or destruction of any election material can result in a 24-month imprisonment.

Undue Influence  –  vote buying & selling 

If you accept money or any other inducement after the announcement of an election date, or if you give money or an inducement to corruptly influence someone to vote or not vote, you will face penalties. You are liable to be fined N100,000 or imprisoned for 12 months, or both.

Violence, threats, or campaign obstruction

If you threaten a person with violence or injury to compel that person to vote or refrain from voting, or you prevent any political aspirant from free use of the media vehicles, mobilisation of political support and campaign at an election, you will be liable to be fined N1 million or imprisoned for three years. 

Written & edited by Nigeria Fact-Checkers Coalition (NFC) ahead of the Anambra 2025 election.

YouTube fueling misinformation on medical cannabis – Study

0

A new study published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) has found that a majority of YouTube videos about medical cannabis contain unreliable or misleading information, despite the platform’s efforts to promote credible health sources.

The study, titled “Misinformation About Medical Cannabis in YouTube Videos: Systematic Review,” conducted by Shivank Khare, Simon Erridge, Swathikan Chidambaram, and Mikael Hans Sodergren from the United Kingdom, evaluated the quality and reliability of information about medical cannabis on YouTube and examined how video popularity relates to content quality.

After systematically reviewing 800 YouTube videos on medical cannabis, and analysing 516 after applying exclusion criteria. Using Google Trends, they identified relevant search terms and categorised videos into three groups: nonmedical educational channels, medical education channels, and independent users.

The findings revealed that independent creators who are often non-experts dominated the space, accounting for 84.3 per cent (435 videos). In contrast, only 12.2 per cent (63 videos) were produced by medical education channels.

READ: How content creators use AI to misinform young children on YouTube – Report

Despite their limited presence, the videos collectively reached 119 million views, underscoring YouTube’s growing influence as a source of health information. However, the study highlighted major concerns about credibility and accuracy.

Using two established evaluation tools, the DISCERN grade and the Health on the Net (HON) code, the researchers assessed each video’s accuracy, transparency, and overall trustworthiness. The results revealed low average scores across all categories.

Non-medical educational channels scored the highest in reliability (DISCERN score of 47.8), while independent users scored the lowest (33.5). However, popularity did not always align with quality.

The most-viewed videos were not necessarily the most accurate. In fact, medical experts videos averaged just 5,721 views, compared to the hundreds of thousands drawn by nonmedical creators.

Interestingly, while medical education sources were more reliable than independent creators, they still performed below non-medical educational channels, many of which were linked to news organisations.

The study suggests that this could be because medical sources often use technical language and longer, lecture-style formats better suited to academic audiences. In contrast, nonmedical creators tend to use simpler language, catchy visuals, and storytelling, making their content more relatable and shareable.

READ ALSO: YouTube creators using AI misinformation to target black celebrities

“YouTube is a key source of information on medical cannabis, but the credibility of videos varies widely. Independent users attract the highest viewers but have reduced reliability according to the DISCERN and HON scores,” the researchers concluded.

The authors warned that the dominance of less reliable creators could fuel health misinformation, especially on sensitive topics like cannabis use. They recommended stronger content moderation and better promotion of verified health sources to ensure accurate, evidence-based information reaches a wider audience.

With 2.5 billion monthly users, YouTube remains one of the world’s largest health information platforms but as this study shows, not all viral content should be trusted.

Why you should not trust every screenshot

SCREENSHOTS have become a staple of online communication, circulating from viral tweets to breaking news headlines, and are often treated as instant proof.

But screenshots can be misleading or completely fake. A doctored tweet attributed to a politician, an edited bank alert, or a fabricated news headline can spread online in seconds, convincing thousands before fact-checkers even weigh in.

The FactCheckHub has debunked some of these instances listed above, which can be seen here, here, and here

READ ALSO: How to verify social media profiles, pages

Because screenshots look authentic and are easy to share, they have become one of the simplest tools for fuelling misinformation, especially in fast-moving news cycles where people are less likely to question their accuracy.

False proof in a click

Creating a fake screenshot is a fast and easy process. Free editing apps let anyone alter names, wording, or even the number of likes and comments on a post in seconds; some fabricators go further and invent entire tweets or headlines that were never published.

Another common tactic is to change a news headline in a screen grab so it appears to come from a reputable outlet, also known as manipulated headlines, and because screenshots are static images, they carry no clickable links or metadata to prove authenticity. Those features make screenshots a perfect vehicle for misinformation: they look plausible, spread quickly, and are hard for casual users to verify at a glance.

Even unedited screenshots can distort the truth. A simple crop might remove the date, making an old post appear recent, or hide key replies that shift the meaning of a conversation.

In some cases, satirical comments have been screen – shotted and re-shared as if they were accurate statements, misleading audiences who never see the full thread. Beyond this, screenshots strip away important digital cues such as timestamps, source links, and engagement history that would normally help verify authenticity. Once those details are gone, it becomes harder for readers to judge credibility, and easier for misinformation to spread unchecked.

How to verify screenshots

Check the source

Go straight to the account or website shown in the screenshot — don’t rely on the image itself. Confirm the handle or URL exactly (look for impostor accounts with extra characters), check for verification marks where relevant, and scan the profile for history and tone: does the account regularly post that kind of content? Look for the original post on the platform (not just reposts) and note the publish date and time. If the screenshot claims to be from an organisation, check the organisation’s official site or other verified social accounts for the same story.

READ : Foreign actors misuse picture of murdered muslim villagers to depict christian massacre in Nigeria

Search the wording

Copy the exact text (or type a short, unique phrase) and run it in quotes through a search engine and the social-platform search bar. This reveals exact matches, earlier posts, or reputable coverage that confirms or contradicts the claim. Search variations and translations that are too misquoted or paraphrase the text can hide the original context.

Do a reverse image search

Upload the screenshot to Google Lens, Google Images, TinEye, or Yandex. Look for the earliest appearance of the image, alternative captions, or higher-resolution originals. If the same image appears with different dates, captions, or locations, that’s a clue it’s being reused or misrepresented. Also, watch out for older timestamps, different captions, source credited to a stock photo site or a different event/location.

Look at the details

Inspect the screenshot closely and observe User Interface (UI) elements such as platform logos, buttons, fonts, alignment, spacing, and image quality. Poor cropping, inconsistent fonts, odd punctuation, mismatched icons, or blurred/warped areas usually indicate editing. On news screenshots, check if the headline style matches that outlet’s usual layout (font, byline placement, dateline).

Check metadata and original files 

Screenshots strip metadata, but if you can access the original image or video file check the Exchangeable Image File Format. EXIF/metadata for creation date, device info, and geolocation. Use an EXIF viewer or forensic tool. If metadata is missing or clearly altered, treat the image with caution.

READ ALSO: How information disorder heightens tension, confuses public during crisis

Many platforms and messaging apps remove EXIF data. Absence alone isn’t proof of fakery, but the presence of conflicting metadata is useful.

Corroborate with other sources

Look for independent reporting, eyewitness posts, official statements, or on-the-ground photos from multiple users. For location-based claims, try geolocation: match visible landmarks, road signs, or building features with satellite imagery or Street View. If only one account is pushing the claim and nobody else, especially local media, is reporting it, treat it as unverified.

Mind timeline and context

Screenshots can be decontextualised, an old tweet made to look recent, or a satirical post reused seriously. Verify timestamps, check the thread/replies for clarification, and see whether the screenshot omits surrounding conversation that changes meaning.

Use verification tools and experts

When available, consult reverse-search tools, archived pages such as Wayback Machine, or the archive.is and social monitoring platforms. Try reaching out to the original poster and requesting the live link or source. If you can’t verify quickly, flag the content as unverified rather than share it. Encourage readers to wait for corroboration, and report the post to the platform if it violates policies.

Old image falsely used to depict airstrike in Kwara

A claim that an image shows multiple airstrikes conducted by the Nigerian Air Force in some troubled towns in Kwara state has surfaced on the internet.

The claim was made by an X user, @milnewsng, alongside a picture that showed the marked area for an airstrike.

The caption read:

The Nigerian Air Force Air Task Force OPFY Sector 3 has conducted multiple airstrikes in Kakihun, Oke-Ode, Babanla, and surrounding areas in Kwara State. Recce + CAS ops were executed as threat deterrence & bandits/terrorists seen at East of Babanla were targeted in airstrikes.

Since the inception of the claim on Monday, September 29, 2025, it has generated a traction of over 70,000 views, 590 likes, and 237 reposts.

CLAIM

Image shows airstrike on Kwara communities.

THE FINDINGS

Findings by The FactCheckHub show that the claim is MISLEADING!

Screenshot of the claim extracted from X; Insert MISLEADING verdict
Screenshot of the claim extracted from X; Insert MISLEADING verdict

When the image was subjected to a Google Lens search, it traced back to earlier appearances where it had been used as a featured photo in news reports.

One such report, published by Zagazola Makama, stated that on October 25, 2024, Nigerian Air Force (NAF) airstrikes eliminated scores of Boko Haram fighters at two key locations in Bula Marwa, Borno State. The strikes reportedly destroyed several motorcycles and thwarted planned terrorist activities, marking a major contribution by the Air Component of Operation HADIN KAI in the fight against insurgency.

Other media outlets also carried the same report at the time, as seen here and here.

However, further checks revealed that although some media houses had indeed reported airstrikes in parts of Kwara State on Sunday, September 28, the image circulating was misleading, as it was falsely used to depict the incident.

THE VERDICT

The claim that the image shows an airstrike in Kwara communities is misleading; the image is from an airstrike in Bula Marwa, Borno state, from 2024.

Image does not show Nnamdi Kanu’s son receiving award

0

A claim that Nnamdi Kanu’s son is the first child to win an international competition has been circulating on X.

The claim was initially posted by Charles Chukwuemeka Oputa, also known as Charly Boy, on his X handle alongside an image of a boy receiving an award.

The claim read:

Nnamdi Kanu’s son has shocked the world by becoming the first child ever to win English, Mathematics, and Russian Language in an international world brain competition.

The 11-year-old prodigy outshined the United Kingdom in their very own language, emerging as the champion. He went further to defeat some of the world’s strongest young minds, proving his brilliance on the global stage.

This historic victory has not only placed him in the spotlight but also written his name in the record books as one of the most gifted children of his generation.

A LION BEGATS A LION!

READ ALSO : Charly boy’s 2024 comment falsely attributed to Emir Sanusi

Since the claim was posted on Wednesday, October 1 2025, it has garnered an impression of thousand of views, 24,000 likes, 4,600 reposts and 1,400 comments.

Another X user also posted it and it has also received a significant amount of traction.

CLAIM
Image shows Nnamdi Kanu’s son receiving an academic award

THE FINDINGS 

Findings by The FactCheckHub shows that the claim is FALSE!

Screenshot of the claim on X; insert FALSE verdict
Screenshot of the claim on X; insert FALSE verdict

A Google Lens image search identifies the boy as Alejandro Cooper, a talented young actor from Namibia.

The image captures Cooper proudly holding the Best Young African Actor Award, which he received at the 2024 Sotigui Awards, a prestigious pan-African film festival often regarded as the “Oscars of Africa.”

At the lavish ceremony held in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, in November 2024, Cooper was honoured for his outstanding performance as young Lukas in Philippe Talavera’s film Lukas.

In his acceptance speech, Cooper dedicated the award to vulnerable children across the continent, saying:

“Lukas is about street kids, and I would like to dedicate this award to all the children in Africa who don’t have a roof over their heads.”

READ MORE : Is FG seeking Chinese loan to fund Nnamdi Kanu’s prosecution?

THE VERDICT

The claim that the image shows Nnamdi Kanu’s son receiving an academic award is FALSE; the boy in the image is Alejandro Cooper, a child actor from Namibia.

Foreign actors misuse picture of murdered muslim villagers to depict christian massacre in Nigeria

0

A claim that an Image shows Christians being massacred and being buried has surfaced on the internet.

The image shows a large crowd of people gathered around several pickup trucks carrying multiple bodies wrapped in white burial shrouds. The trucks, including green, black, and orange ones, are loaded with the bodies, which appear to be prepared for burial.

An Israeli-based X user, @Vividprowess posted the image alongside a caption :

“Christians are being massacred by Islamists, their women kidnapped and raped, and forced to convert to Islam every day in Nigeria. Silence from the international media. Silence from the United Nations. Silence from Candace Owens. Silence from Tucker Carlson. Where is everyone?

READ ALSO: How true is the claim that nobody was arrested over Owo church massacre? 

Another foreign X user, @realmmalouf, shared the same image with a different caption that reads:
Christians are being massacred, and their women kidnapped, raped, and forcibly converted daily in Nigeria. This year, more Christians have been killed in Nigeria than Palestinians in Gaza. And yet, not a single protest for them!
Since the inception of the claim on Sunday, September 28, 2025, both posts have garnered an impression of over two million views, more than 100,000 likes, and nearly 50,000 reposts.

CLAIM

An image shows massacred Christians in trucks

THE FINDINGS

Findings by The FactCheckHub show that the claim is MISLEADING!

Screenshot of an appearance of the claim on X; INSERT Misleading verdict
Screenshot of an appearance of the claim on X; INSERT Misleading verdict

When the image was analysed in a Google Lens search, it led us to news report instances where it has been used as a featured image, as seen here and here. The media houses had credited the image source to Reuters.

THE VERDICT

The claim that an image in circulation shows massacred Christians in trucks is misleading; it shows the Islamic burial rites of murdered Yobe residents by bandits in the state.

No, 300 people were not recently rescued from a chained house in Kaduna

0

A Facebook page, Progressive Nigerian Politics, has shared photos of malnourished persons, including children, with the claim that over 300 people were recently rescued from a house in Kaduna State.

The post, captioned as “BREAKING News!!!”, alleged that the victims were chained and subjected to abuse in the facility, claiming the discovery was made by police in Kaduna.

As of September 29, 2025, the post had generated several reactions and comments, with some users questioning why the story was not carried by mainstream Nigerian news outlets if true.

CLAIM

Over 300 people were recently rescued by police from a chained house in Kaduna State.

screenshot of the viral post

THE FINDINGS

Findings by The FactCheckHub show that the claim is MISLEADING.

A Google reverse image search on one of the photos shared by the Facebook page traced it back to 2019, when the incident was first reported.

At the time, the Nigerian Police raided a facility in Rigasa, Igabi Local Government Area of Kaduna State, and discovered over 300 people chained in inhumane conditions.

The victims included children, and some were nationals from Burkina Faso, Mali, and other African countries.

Multiple credible news outlets, including BBC and Premium Times, reported the raid in September 2019. No credible evidence exists that such a rescue has occurred recently.

The viral Facebook post, therefore, recycles old photos and reports to give the impression of a new event.

VERDICT

The claim that over 300 people were recently rescued from a chained house in Kaduna is MISLEADING. The incident actually occurred in 2019.