Home Blog Page 27

YouTube fueling misinformation on medical cannabis – Study

0

A new study published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) has found that a majority of YouTube videos about medical cannabis contain unreliable or misleading information, despite the platform’s efforts to promote credible health sources.

The study, titled “Misinformation About Medical Cannabis in YouTube Videos: Systematic Review,” conducted by Shivank Khare, Simon Erridge, Swathikan Chidambaram, and Mikael Hans Sodergren from the United Kingdom, evaluated the quality and reliability of information about medical cannabis on YouTube and examined how video popularity relates to content quality.

After systematically reviewing 800 YouTube videos on medical cannabis, and analysing 516 after applying exclusion criteria. Using Google Trends, they identified relevant search terms and categorised videos into three groups: nonmedical educational channels, medical education channels, and independent users.

The findings revealed that independent creators who are often non-experts dominated the space, accounting for 84.3 per cent (435 videos). In contrast, only 12.2 per cent (63 videos) were produced by medical education channels.

READ: How content creators use AI to misinform young children on YouTube – Report

Despite their limited presence, the videos collectively reached 119 million views, underscoring YouTube’s growing influence as a source of health information. However, the study highlighted major concerns about credibility and accuracy.

Using two established evaluation tools, the DISCERN grade and the Health on the Net (HON) code, the researchers assessed each video’s accuracy, transparency, and overall trustworthiness. The results revealed low average scores across all categories.

Non-medical educational channels scored the highest in reliability (DISCERN score of 47.8), while independent users scored the lowest (33.5). However, popularity did not always align with quality.

The most-viewed videos were not necessarily the most accurate. In fact, medical experts videos averaged just 5,721 views, compared to the hundreds of thousands drawn by nonmedical creators.

Interestingly, while medical education sources were more reliable than independent creators, they still performed below non-medical educational channels, many of which were linked to news organisations.

The study suggests that this could be because medical sources often use technical language and longer, lecture-style formats better suited to academic audiences. In contrast, nonmedical creators tend to use simpler language, catchy visuals, and storytelling, making their content more relatable and shareable.

READ ALSO: YouTube creators using AI misinformation to target black celebrities

“YouTube is a key source of information on medical cannabis, but the credibility of videos varies widely. Independent users attract the highest viewers but have reduced reliability according to the DISCERN and HON scores,” the researchers concluded.

The authors warned that the dominance of less reliable creators could fuel health misinformation, especially on sensitive topics like cannabis use. They recommended stronger content moderation and better promotion of verified health sources to ensure accurate, evidence-based information reaches a wider audience.

With 2.5 billion monthly users, YouTube remains one of the world’s largest health information platforms but as this study shows, not all viral content should be trusted.

Why you should not trust every screenshot

SCREENSHOTS have become a staple of online communication, circulating from viral tweets to breaking news headlines, and are often treated as instant proof.

But screenshots can be misleading or completely fake. A doctored tweet attributed to a politician, an edited bank alert, or a fabricated news headline can spread online in seconds, convincing thousands before fact-checkers even weigh in.

The FactCheckHub has debunked some of these instances listed above, which can be seen here, here, and here

READ ALSO: How to verify social media profiles, pages

Because screenshots look authentic and are easy to share, they have become one of the simplest tools for fuelling misinformation, especially in fast-moving news cycles where people are less likely to question their accuracy.

False proof in a click

Creating a fake screenshot is a fast and easy process. Free editing apps let anyone alter names, wording, or even the number of likes and comments on a post in seconds; some fabricators go further and invent entire tweets or headlines that were never published.

Another common tactic is to change a news headline in a screen grab so it appears to come from a reputable outlet, also known as manipulated headlines, and because screenshots are static images, they carry no clickable links or metadata to prove authenticity. Those features make screenshots a perfect vehicle for misinformation: they look plausible, spread quickly, and are hard for casual users to verify at a glance.

Even unedited screenshots can distort the truth. A simple crop might remove the date, making an old post appear recent, or hide key replies that shift the meaning of a conversation.

In some cases, satirical comments have been screen – shotted and re-shared as if they were accurate statements, misleading audiences who never see the full thread. Beyond this, screenshots strip away important digital cues such as timestamps, source links, and engagement history that would normally help verify authenticity. Once those details are gone, it becomes harder for readers to judge credibility, and easier for misinformation to spread unchecked.

How to verify screenshots

Check the source

Go straight to the account or website shown in the screenshot — don’t rely on the image itself. Confirm the handle or URL exactly (look for impostor accounts with extra characters), check for verification marks where relevant, and scan the profile for history and tone: does the account regularly post that kind of content? Look for the original post on the platform (not just reposts) and note the publish date and time. If the screenshot claims to be from an organisation, check the organisation’s official site or other verified social accounts for the same story.

READ : Foreign actors misuse picture of murdered muslim villagers to depict christian massacre in Nigeria

Search the wording

Copy the exact text (or type a short, unique phrase) and run it in quotes through a search engine and the social-platform search bar. This reveals exact matches, earlier posts, or reputable coverage that confirms or contradicts the claim. Search variations and translations that are too misquoted or paraphrase the text can hide the original context.

Do a reverse image search

Upload the screenshot to Google Lens, Google Images, TinEye, or Yandex. Look for the earliest appearance of the image, alternative captions, or higher-resolution originals. If the same image appears with different dates, captions, or locations, that’s a clue it’s being reused or misrepresented. Also, watch out for older timestamps, different captions, source credited to a stock photo site or a different event/location.

Look at the details

Inspect the screenshot closely and observe User Interface (UI) elements such as platform logos, buttons, fonts, alignment, spacing, and image quality. Poor cropping, inconsistent fonts, odd punctuation, mismatched icons, or blurred/warped areas usually indicate editing. On news screenshots, check if the headline style matches that outlet’s usual layout (font, byline placement, dateline).

Check metadata and original files 

Screenshots strip metadata, but if you can access the original image or video file check the Exchangeable Image File Format. EXIF/metadata for creation date, device info, and geolocation. Use an EXIF viewer or forensic tool. If metadata is missing or clearly altered, treat the image with caution.

READ ALSO: How information disorder heightens tension, confuses public during crisis

Many platforms and messaging apps remove EXIF data. Absence alone isn’t proof of fakery, but the presence of conflicting metadata is useful.

Corroborate with other sources

Look for independent reporting, eyewitness posts, official statements, or on-the-ground photos from multiple users. For location-based claims, try geolocation: match visible landmarks, road signs, or building features with satellite imagery or Street View. If only one account is pushing the claim and nobody else, especially local media, is reporting it, treat it as unverified.

Mind timeline and context

Screenshots can be decontextualised, an old tweet made to look recent, or a satirical post reused seriously. Verify timestamps, check the thread/replies for clarification, and see whether the screenshot omits surrounding conversation that changes meaning.

Use verification tools and experts

When available, consult reverse-search tools, archived pages such as Wayback Machine, or the archive.is and social monitoring platforms. Try reaching out to the original poster and requesting the live link or source. If you can’t verify quickly, flag the content as unverified rather than share it. Encourage readers to wait for corroboration, and report the post to the platform if it violates policies.

Old image falsely used to depict airstrike in Kwara

A claim that an image shows multiple airstrikes conducted by the Nigerian Air Force in some troubled towns in Kwara state has surfaced on the internet.

The claim was made by an X user, @milnewsng, alongside a picture that showed the marked area for an airstrike.

The caption read:

The Nigerian Air Force Air Task Force OPFY Sector 3 has conducted multiple airstrikes in Kakihun, Oke-Ode, Babanla, and surrounding areas in Kwara State. Recce + CAS ops were executed as threat deterrence & bandits/terrorists seen at East of Babanla were targeted in airstrikes.

Since the inception of the claim on Monday, September 29, 2025, it has generated a traction of over 70,000 views, 590 likes, and 237 reposts.

CLAIM

Image shows airstrike on Kwara communities.

THE FINDINGS

Findings by The FactCheckHub show that the claim is MISLEADING!

Screenshot of the claim extracted from X; Insert MISLEADING verdict
Screenshot of the claim extracted from X; Insert MISLEADING verdict

When the image was subjected to a Google Lens search, it traced back to earlier appearances where it had been used as a featured photo in news reports.

One such report, published by Zagazola Makama, stated that on October 25, 2024, Nigerian Air Force (NAF) airstrikes eliminated scores of Boko Haram fighters at two key locations in Bula Marwa, Borno State. The strikes reportedly destroyed several motorcycles and thwarted planned terrorist activities, marking a major contribution by the Air Component of Operation HADIN KAI in the fight against insurgency.

Other media outlets also carried the same report at the time, as seen here and here.

However, further checks revealed that although some media houses had indeed reported airstrikes in parts of Kwara State on Sunday, September 28, the image circulating was misleading, as it was falsely used to depict the incident.

THE VERDICT

The claim that the image shows an airstrike in Kwara communities is misleading; the image is from an airstrike in Bula Marwa, Borno state, from 2024.

Image does not show Nnamdi Kanu’s son receiving award

0

A claim that Nnamdi Kanu’s son is the first child to win an international competition has been circulating on X.

The claim was initially posted by Charles Chukwuemeka Oputa, also known as Charly Boy, on his X handle alongside an image of a boy receiving an award.

The claim read:

Nnamdi Kanu’s son has shocked the world by becoming the first child ever to win English, Mathematics, and Russian Language in an international world brain competition.

The 11-year-old prodigy outshined the United Kingdom in their very own language, emerging as the champion. He went further to defeat some of the world’s strongest young minds, proving his brilliance on the global stage.

This historic victory has not only placed him in the spotlight but also written his name in the record books as one of the most gifted children of his generation.

A LION BEGATS A LION!

READ ALSO : Charly boy’s 2024 comment falsely attributed to Emir Sanusi

Since the claim was posted on Wednesday, October 1 2025, it has garnered an impression of thousand of views, 24,000 likes, 4,600 reposts and 1,400 comments.

Another X user also posted it and it has also received a significant amount of traction.

CLAIM
Image shows Nnamdi Kanu’s son receiving an academic award

THE FINDINGS 

Findings by The FactCheckHub shows that the claim is FALSE!

Screenshot of the claim on X; insert FALSE verdict
Screenshot of the claim on X; insert FALSE verdict

A Google Lens image search identifies the boy as Alejandro Cooper, a talented young actor from Namibia.

The image captures Cooper proudly holding the Best Young African Actor Award, which he received at the 2024 Sotigui Awards, a prestigious pan-African film festival often regarded as the “Oscars of Africa.”

At the lavish ceremony held in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, in November 2024, Cooper was honoured for his outstanding performance as young Lukas in Philippe Talavera’s film Lukas.

In his acceptance speech, Cooper dedicated the award to vulnerable children across the continent, saying:

“Lukas is about street kids, and I would like to dedicate this award to all the children in Africa who don’t have a roof over their heads.”

READ MORE : Is FG seeking Chinese loan to fund Nnamdi Kanu’s prosecution?

THE VERDICT

The claim that the image shows Nnamdi Kanu’s son receiving an academic award is FALSE; the boy in the image is Alejandro Cooper, a child actor from Namibia.

Foreign actors misuse picture of murdered muslim villagers to depict christian massacre in Nigeria

0

A claim that an Image shows Christians being massacred and being buried has surfaced on the internet.

The image shows a large crowd of people gathered around several pickup trucks carrying multiple bodies wrapped in white burial shrouds. The trucks, including green, black, and orange ones, are loaded with the bodies, which appear to be prepared for burial.

An Israeli-based X user, @Vividprowess posted the image alongside a caption :

“Christians are being massacred by Islamists, their women kidnapped and raped, and forced to convert to Islam every day in Nigeria. Silence from the international media. Silence from the United Nations. Silence from Candace Owens. Silence from Tucker Carlson. Where is everyone?

READ ALSO: How true is the claim that nobody was arrested over Owo church massacre? 

Another foreign X user, @realmmalouf, shared the same image with a different caption that reads:
Christians are being massacred, and their women kidnapped, raped, and forcibly converted daily in Nigeria. This year, more Christians have been killed in Nigeria than Palestinians in Gaza. And yet, not a single protest for them!
Since the inception of the claim on Sunday, September 28, 2025, both posts have garnered an impression of over two million views, more than 100,000 likes, and nearly 50,000 reposts.

CLAIM

An image shows massacred Christians in trucks

THE FINDINGS

Findings by The FactCheckHub show that the claim is MISLEADING!

Screenshot of an appearance of the claim on X; INSERT Misleading verdict
Screenshot of an appearance of the claim on X; INSERT Misleading verdict

When the image was analysed in a Google Lens search, it led us to news report instances where it has been used as a featured image, as seen here and here. The media houses had credited the image source to Reuters.

THE VERDICT

The claim that an image in circulation shows massacred Christians in trucks is misleading; it shows the Islamic burial rites of murdered Yobe residents by bandits in the state.

No, 300 people were not recently rescued from a chained house in Kaduna

0

A Facebook page, Progressive Nigerian Politics, has shared photos of malnourished persons, including children, with the claim that over 300 people were recently rescued from a house in Kaduna State.

The post, captioned as “BREAKING News!!!”, alleged that the victims were chained and subjected to abuse in the facility, claiming the discovery was made by police in Kaduna.

As of September 29, 2025, the post had generated several reactions and comments, with some users questioning why the story was not carried by mainstream Nigerian news outlets if true.

CLAIM

Over 300 people were recently rescued by police from a chained house in Kaduna State.

screenshot of the viral post

THE FINDINGS

Findings by The FactCheckHub show that the claim is MISLEADING.

A Google reverse image search on one of the photos shared by the Facebook page traced it back to 2019, when the incident was first reported.

At the time, the Nigerian Police raided a facility in Rigasa, Igabi Local Government Area of Kaduna State, and discovered over 300 people chained in inhumane conditions.

The victims included children, and some were nationals from Burkina Faso, Mali, and other African countries.

Multiple credible news outlets, including BBC and Premium Times, reported the raid in September 2019. No credible evidence exists that such a rescue has occurred recently.

The viral Facebook post, therefore, recycles old photos and reports to give the impression of a new event.

VERDICT

The claim that over 300 people were recently rescued from a chained house in Kaduna is MISLEADING. The incident actually occurred in 2019.

Dembele NOT first black player to clinch Ballon d’Or

0

A claim that French footballer Ousmane Dembele is the first black player to win the Ballon d’Or has surfaced online.

The claim was circulated online following Dembele’s win at the 2025 Men’s Ballon d’Or. A user on X  @matchDcentral posted the claim with a caption :

Dembele is the first black person to win the Ballon d’Or.
Since the post was published on Tuesday, September 23, 2025, it has garnered over 600,000 views, 16,000 likes, and 1,000 reposts.

READ MORE: Rabiu Ali NOT nominated for 2025 Ballon d’Or

The post was also seen here and here.
Ousmane Dembélé is a French professional footballer who plays as a forward for Ligue 1 club Paris Saint-Germain and the France national team. Dembélé is one of ten players to have won the FIFA World Cup, UEFA Champions League, and the Ballon d’Or in his career.
CLAIM

Ousmane Dembele is the first black player to win the Ballon d’Or

THE FINDINGS

Findings by The FactCheckHub indicate that the claim is FALSE!

The Ballon d’Or (French for “Golden Ball”) is one of football’s most prestigious individual awards, presented annually by the French magazine France Football.

It honours the player judged to have delivered the best performance over the preceding season, taking into account individual brilliance, team success, and influence on matches. Over the decades, it has evolved originally Europe-only award and later expanded to all players worldwide.

Since 2016, the winner has been decided by a panel of international journalists.

The 2025 Ballon d’Or ceremony took place on 22 September 2025 at the Théâtre du Châtelet in Paris, recognising performances in the 2024–25 season.

In the men’s category, Ousmane Dembélé of Paris Saint-Germain won the award for the first time, finishing ahead of Barcelona’s Lamine Yamal (runner-up) and Vitinha (third) in the voting.

Screenshot of the claim; Insert FALSE verdict

Screenshot of the claim; Insert FALSE verdict

However, he is not the first black person to have won the award. Findings by The FactCheckHub showed that in 1965, Eusébio da Silva Ferreira, the Portuguese forward of Mozambican heritage, won the Ballon d’Or.

Also in 1995, George Weah of Liberia won the Ballon d’Or, making history as the first African player to claim the prestigious prize before Dembele’s clinch in 2025.

READ ALSO: Did any African country win men’s basketball game at the Olympics since 1996?

THE VERDICT 

The claim that Dembele is the first black player to win the Ballon d’Or is false; Eusebio of Mozambican heritage and George Weah had clinched the prestigious prize before him.

How misinformation, legal loopholes throw Nigerian women into surrogacy ditch

0

By: Simbiat Bakare

When Temitope Afolabi realised her husband could get imprisoned due to debt he incurred from a bad business deal, she resolved to become a surrogate to earn money to save him. She had initially considered selling one of her kidneys, but unable to find a source, she settled for being a surrogate.

Surrogacy is a form of assisted reproduction in which a woman (the surrogate) carries a pregnancy on behalf of a third party—the intended parent. Usually, the surrogate is paid for her service in a commercial arrangement.

The global surrogacy industry is valued at $27.9 billion, and the United Nations regards the practice as a form of violence against women and girls. Meanwhile, in Nigeria, surrogacy is becoming increasingly common. Celebrities like Nancy UmehIni Edo, and Chimamanda Adichie have used surrogate services. Lifestyle influencer Ife Agoro also plans to use one regardless of health challenges.

But what is the experience of surrogates in Africa’s most populous country, and how did it become so common? I followed Temitope’s journey from pregnancy to postpartum through a Facebook Messenger conversation, where she unveiled her experience with me. I would eventually meet with her for more details.

Temitope became a surrogate in May 2024. She was paid about N2,233,000, including transportation, accommodation allowance, childbirth fee, and wardrobe allowance.

An infographic representing a breakdown of Temitope’s payment plan.

However, her compensation did not reflect Nigeria’s economic realities. Her N3,000 transportation allowance was insufficient to cover her logistics. She lives at Sango Ota, along Oju ore in Ogun State, and was to travel 41.9 kilometres to her healthcare centre in Ikorodu.

Although her transport fare was later increased to N5,000 after several complaints, the catch was that she would visit a clinic in Ikeja, Lagos State. Amidst tears, Temitope swore she always added an extra N1,000 from her funds to cover the lapse in logistics costs while enduring the stress of commuting farther. She also barely had enough money to eat after she paid her rent and her children’s school fees.

Her teary voice, while sharing her experience, soon switched to anger when she recounted that her agent collected N450,000 for logistics from intending parents, alleging they went to the hospital via Uber.

“Nigerians are users,” she said, her voice hoarse. “They just use people because of what they are going through. They did not even look at the stress of carrying pregnancies, vomiting, and everything. They are just using us as slaves because they believe that if you don’t do it, another person will.”

Although Temitope was informed of the compensation plan from the outset, she wasn’t aware of the terms and conditions until much later. Her contract, dated August 26, 2024, was given to her to sign when she was already three months pregnant. It includes a death clause stating she understands that she could die. A BBC report highlights that Nigeria is the worst country to give birth in, with one death happening every seven minutes. Also, Temitope’s contract mandates that only the intended parent and the doctor can decide how to proceed if the pregnancy is harming her health. She is also forbidden to speak to the media.

Temitope’s surrogacy contract Sensitive information has been blurred for the confidentiality of the parties involved

During her journey as a surrogate, Temitope was prohibited from leaving her home and eating specific food items for two weeks: noodles, orange, pineapple, mineral drinks, and anything that burns were forbidden. She was also mandated to visit the agency regularly, even when she didn’t feel like it, or her child was sick.

After she delivered the baby on Feb 24, 2025, Temitope suffered several medical conditions. She began menstruating thrice a month, had a fibroid and ovarian cysts, and often suffered from lightheadedness. When she complained, she was told by her agent that post-partum healthcare ends at six weeks.

“I feel used, stupid, and depressed,” she said, expressing regret at being a surrogate. “At the end of the day, my husband still went to prison on Dec. 18, 2024.”

Like Temitope, another surrogate I spoke to reported medical challenges after childbirth. The student of the University of Benin, who wants to be kept anonymous, gave birth to twins as a surrogate. She shared that her healing process after birth was difficult, and she spent half of the money she was paid just to get better.

A doctor, Sunday Olarenwaju, the managing director of Mother and Child Hospital, said that twin pregnancies are dangerous, carries, the higher the risk of being exposed to diseases, including hypertension, haemorrhage, and even death.

Dr Sunday Olarenwaju, Managing Director, Mother and Child Hospital at Omole, Lagos.

Researchers also document that when a woman gestates an embryo unrelated to her genes, she is more likely to develop placental issues and preeclampsia, among other ailments.

“Nigerians do not understand,” Temitope said, explaining she once tried to raise concerns about the experience of surrogates on social media. “They say we agreed to it. If not for financial problems, who would agree to such a thing? There is no one to fight for us,” her voice flattened in resignation.

Facebook group fuels surrogacy in Nigeria

While the surrogates I conversed with are of different age groups, one thing they have in common is that they belong to the Facebook Surrogate group: Egg donor and surrogate mother in Nigeria. The community, created on January 5, 2023, has over 4,800 members within two years.

An image showing the number of members in the group as of May 5, 2025.

Countless surrogacy adverts flood the group daily. Some adverts encourage people to contact them via DM (Facebook Messenger) and WhatsApp.

A collage of surrogate adverts in the group

Meta is the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and Messenger. The multinational technology company has an estimated monthly active user base of 3.98 billion on its apps and has a community standard guiding its platforms.

Its website states that it has “a responsibility to promote the best of what people can do together by keeping people safe and preventing harm.” Its Community Standards, which guide Facebook advertisements, also prohibit content that facilitates human exploitation, such as sales of children and labour exploitation.

I contacted Meta through their dedicated email for the press. I inquired whether they consider surrogacy a form of human exploitation and, if so, why surrogacy groups such as Egg donors and surrogate mothers in Nigeria, which facilitate surrogacy for women like Temitope, exist. The tech giant deleted the group, with the response,

“Ads and Groups that exploit people through the sale or illegal adoption of children violate our policies, and we remove this content when it’s found – as we have done in this case.”

An image of the deleted Egg donor and surrogate mother in Nigeria by Meta after this investigation

However, Olivia Maurel, the spokesperson for the Casablanca Declaration, an international non-governmental organisation working on a universal ban on surrogacy, advised that, beyond deleting such groups, Facebook should implement a policy that monitors and bans all forms of surrogacy advertisements in vulnerable regions like Nigeria.

Misinformation abounds

Beyond its rules against human exploitation, Meta is explicit in its intolerance for misinformation. Yet, conversations with surrogate agents on WhatsApp are often half-truths, outright lies, or concealment in their pursuit to recruit women.

One such experience is an interaction I had with a surrogate agent, Omobolanle Oguntolu, on WhatsApp. I found her advertisement for Surrogacy on Facebook in the Surrogate Mothers Nigeria group, which has over 5,600 members. She added her phone number to the post so interested surrogates could contact her through her agency, Regal Surrogate Services.

Picture 8 Surrogate Mothers Nigeria group & Regal Surrogate Services advert (1)

I brought the group Surrogate Mothers Nigeria to Meta’s attention, and they deleted it. However, when I contacted Omobolanle on WhatsApp about being a surrogate, she claimed she had helped more than 35 women become surrogates.

She told me I would be paid about N2,243,000 and sent me a breakdown.

An infographic representation of the breakdown of the N2,243,000 payment plan

I tried negotiating a higher figure with her and other agents, but soon discovered it was a take-it-or-leave-it deal. One surrogate agent, who identified herself simply as Sophia, had a disclaimer to the financial offer she gave me. “Kindly read through the rules and regulations of the payment plan; there must be no complaints once you have signed the contract.”

I returned to Omobolanle. I told her that it was my first time being a surrogate and that she should tell me everything I needed to know. She responded that aside from the payment, there wasn’t much, but she offered to answer any more questions I had.

 “Since this is your first time, you should know what you are getting yourself into,” she said.

But when I asked her which hospital I would use as a surrogate, she told me it was confidential and she wouldn’t give me the details until I was on my way there. Puzzled, I asked her how I could research the hospital with which my fate lies; she said I couldn’t. I asked what would happen if I experienced complications during the pregnancy or if I died. Surprisingly, she gave me a “100 per cent guarantee for safety.”

Jumoke Falade, a nurse practitioner at Lagos State University Teaching Hospital, was shocked that surrogacy could be tagged “safe,” saying that it came with risks associated with pregnancy, including death.

Omobolanle also claimed that as a surrogate, I would birth the baby through a cesarean section (CS) because it was “better and safer” than a natural birth. However, Olarenwaju, who is also a gynaecologist at Mother and Child Hospital, revealed that natural birth, not CS, is better for a surrogate because it comes with a faster post-delivery recovery process and does not leave a scar.

The medical professional further clarified that surrogacy does not deal only with the usage of the woman’s womb.

“The woman’s lungs are being used to help the baby breathe. The blood is used for circulation, and the nutrients from the woman’s body nourish the baby,” he said. “The womb is only the house of the baby.”

Beyond the health misinformation, Omobolanle affirms that commercial surrogacy is legal in Nigeria, and that is why it is a norm in the country.

But, legal practitioner Marvellous Igbineweka argues that the National Health Act of 2014 provides a framework that makes commercial surrogacy illegal. The Act prohibits the donation of human organs, cells, or tissue for monetary purposes, gains, or profit. The learned fellow further cited that the Child Rights Act of 2003, Section 13 of the Trafficking in Persons (Prohibition) Enforcement and Administration Act, and Order 23 of the Code of Medical Ethics in Nigeria can be used to argue the illegality of the practice.

Another lawyer, Dogo Joy Njeb, emphasised that it is only an argument. She states that “anything the law has not explicitly criminalised is legal.” She added that Nigeria allows citizens to engage in contractual agreements, under which many surrogate arrangements occur.

So, when I asked Omobolanle why I couldn’t find online information about her agency, Regal Surrogate Services, to confirm her legitimacy, she responded that it is just something “she calls herself.”

Nigeria Government Complicity

Omobolanle’s surrogate agency is unregistered. Nigeria is silent on the practice of surrogacy, so the legality of commercial surrogacy is debatable. Members of the National Assembly, responsible for making legislation in the country, have attempted to pass a law but were unsuccessful. The Bill for Establishing a Nigerian Assisted Reproduction Authority (2012) and the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulatory) Bill 2016 were not passed due to lawmakers’ lack of majority support.

I contacted Christiana Eguma, the Head of the Gender Technical Unit (GTU) in the National Assembly, regarding Nigeria’s lack of a surrogacy bill. Christiana is also the Programme Coordinator of Women’s Rights Advancement & Protection Alternatives (WRAPA). She stated that the GTU would intervene by developing a policy brief to highlight the gender, ethical, and health implications of unregulated surrogacy practices.

However, Olamijuwonlo Alao-Akala, a House of Representatives member representing Ogbomoso North, South and Oriire constituencies, is sponsoring a National Surrogacy Regulatory Commission Bill (2024) to remedy the lack of legislation in the country. The bill passed the second reading in the House of Representatives in October 2024. It is expected to monitor and mandate the registration of surrogate agencies, making surrogacy legal. It will also prohibit monetary compensation in surrogacy arrangements (commercial surrogacy). This means that surrogates would not be paid for their service. Hence, carrying a baby without payment (altruistic surrogacy) would be the norm.

Regarding the bill’s relevance, Olamijuwonlo argued, “It is to regulate and evaluate surrogacy in Nigeria, thereby ensuring medical and health laws are not flouted.”

Similarly, Uchenna Okonkwo, representing the Idemili North/Idemili South Federal Constituency of Anambra State, is sponsoring a surrogacy bill titled “A Bill for an Act to Protect the Health and Well-being of Women, Particularly in Relation to Surrogacy and for Related Matters.” The bill will also criminalise commercial surrogacy but legitimise altruistic surrogacy.

However, Olivia, who is also a woman born through surrogacy, during an email correspondence with me, decries the problem with such bills.

“We should not differentiate between commercial and altruistic surrogacy, ever, because there is no real difference between the two. Both rely on the same mechanism: using a woman’s body to fulfil the desires of others, often at the cost of her own health, autonomy, and dignity.”

The United Nations also recommends that countries must eradicate surrogacy in all its forms, criminalise surrogacy agencies and those facilitating it. It states that lawmakers must nullify surrogacy contracts, provide exit support strategies for surrogate mothers and regard them as the legal mothers of the babies they carry.

I contacted Olamijuwonlo via X (formerly Twitter), WhatsApp and email regarding the bill he is sponsoring and the international standard, but he is yet to comment. I then spoke to Uchenna Okonkwo about discussing his surrogacy bill. The lawmaker asked to call back in two hours but never responded to subsequent calls, texts, or emails.

Meanwhile, Olivia warns, “If Nigeria doesn’t act now, it risks becoming a hub for a global market that treats women’s bodies as tools and children as products.”

Back to Square 1

As Temitope continues to battle health challenges as a result of being a surrogate, the N1.3m she was paid for birthing the child was exhausted in three months.

She spent the larger portion of the money to feed, pay her four children’s school fees, send money to her husband in prison, and settle the debts she owed.

Temitope displaying her ponmo for sale

With all the money gone, Temitope now sells dried ponmo (local cow skin), hoping she can make enough to survive and care for her children.

This is republished with consent from Dubawa.

AI-generated images of Alia’s statues circulate online

0

IMAGES of giant statues allegedly depicting Hyacinth Alia, governor of Benue State, have surfaced on the internet.

The images, posted on  X by a user, @SadiqMaunde, show two large statues placed at busy roundabouts, claiming that the monuments are currently being erected in Benue state.

In one of the viral pictures, the statue is dressed in the Tiv traditional black-and-white attire, while another shows the figure in a green suit with a bishop collar.

READ ALSO: AI-generated images circulated as Cristiano Ronaldo purchasing Man Utd shares

The images were accompanied by a caption that read:

The executive governor of Benue state. APC governors just dey compete for clown pass.

Since the post was published on Friday, September 12, 2025, it has garnered over 350,000 views, 2,000 likes, and 702 reposts.

CLAIM

Images show statues of Hyacinth Alia in Benue Roundabouts

THE FINDINGS 

Findings by The FactCheckHub show that the claim is FALSE!

Screenshot of the claim; Insert FALSE verdict
Screenshot of the claim; Insert FALSE verdict

A closer examination of the pictures revealed several features typical of AI-generated images. In the photos, for instance, the workers standing on the scaffolding appear without distinct heads or facial features.

Further scrutiny shows an electrical pole merging unnaturally with the statue and scaffolding, while the texts on nearby billboards are incomprehensible — all common indicators of AI-generated content.

A Google Lens search of the images also returned other similar, AI-generated visuals of the same nature.

READ: AI-generated video of cars on canoes in flooded Lekki sparks discussion on digital literacy

The FactCheckHub also observed that no credible media platform reported the claim that the Benue governor was building statues of himself.

THE VERDICT

The claim that images show statues of Hyacinth Alia in Benue Roundabouts is false; the images are AI-generated.